§Why CasetextPricing

EMG Technology, LLC v. Apple, Inc.

REPLY to Response to Motion re MOTION to Dismiss EMG Technology, LLCs Claims of Alleged Contributory and Induced Infringement of the 196 Patent

4 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 262,161 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint

  2. Advanced Analogic Technologies v. Kinetic Technologies

    No. C-09-1360 MMC (N.D. Cal. Jul. 8, 2009)   Cited 4 times
    Rejecting defendant's reliance on Seagate because it addressed "the 'evidence' necessary 'to establish' willful infringement, not the prerequisites for pleading willful infringement"

  3. APM ASSOCIATES v. NORTH TEXAS TOLLWAY AUTH

    Case No. 4:09-cv-159 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 14, 2009)   Cited 1 times

    Case No. 4:09-cv-159. July 14, 2009 MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS RICHARD SCHELL, District Judge Before the court are the following: 1. Defendant North Texas Tollway Authority's Motion to Dismiss and Brief in Support (de # 3); 2. Plaintiffs' Response to North Texas Tollway Authority's Motion to Dismiss and Brief in Support (de # 5); 3. North Texas Tollway Authority's Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss (de # 7); 4. A Letter Brief to the Court Submitted by Defendant

  4. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 161,322 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."