24 Cited authorities

  1. Link v. Wabash Railroad Co.

    370 U.S. 626 (1962)   Cited 14,840 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Rule 41(b)'s allowance for a party to move to dismiss for failure to prosecute did not implicitly abrogate the court's power to dismiss sua sponte
  2. Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.

    975 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1992)   Cited 4,238 times
    Holding the "good cause" standard of Rule 16 controls after a scheduling order establishes the pleading timetable
  3. Young v. United States ex rel. Vuitton et Fils S. A.

    481 U.S. 787 (1987)   Cited 653 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that appointment of an interested prosecutor is a structural defect
  4. Shillitani v. United States

    384 U.S. 364 (1966)   Cited 1,162 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when an incarcerated contemnor "carr[ies] the keys of [his] prison in [his] own pockets", his contempt is civil in nature
  5. Kapral v. U.S.

    166 F.3d 565 (3d Cir. 1999)   Cited 1,277 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a state court criminal judgment is "final" for purposes of collateral attack in federal court at the conclusion of review in the United States Supreme Court or when the time for seeking certiorari review expires
  6. Longshoremen v. Marine Trade Assn

    389 U.S. 64 (1967)   Cited 342 times
    Holding that the order at issue could "only be described as unintelligible"
  7. Broderick v. Donaldson

    437 F.3d 1226 (D.C. Cir. 2006)   Cited 197 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that for an employee to have her work reviewed by one supervisor rather than another does not by itself constitute an adverse employment action
  8. Dag Enterprises Inc. v. Exxon Mobil Corp.

    226 F.R.D. 95 (D.D.C. 2005)   Cited 60 times
    Holding that when the deadline for discovery expires, parties are obligated to seek a modification of the Scheduling Order by demonstrating "good cause"
  9. Open Am. v. Watergate Spec. Prosecution Force

    547 F.2d 605 (D.C. Cir. 1976)   Cited 128 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the district court properly granted an extension of time to the agency when the agency was deluged with requests for information vastly in excess of that anticipated by Congress, and the agency was processing the requests with due diligence on a first in, first out basis
  10. Reliant Energy Power. Generation, Inc. v. F.E.R.C.

    520 F. Supp. 2d 194 (D.D.C. 2007)   Cited 30 times
    Holding that "spreadsheets" that "analyze[d] raw data" were "protected by Exemption 5"
  11. Rule 16 - Pretrial Conferences; Scheduling; Management

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 16   Cited 25,061 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Adopting the sanctions authorized by Rule 37(b)
  12. Section 552 - Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, records, and proceedings

    5 U.S.C. § 552   Cited 10,934 times   528 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Court's entering of a “Stipulation and Order” approving the parties' terms of dismissal did not amount to a “court-ordered consent decree” that would render the plaintiff the prevailing party