6 Cited authorities

  1. Winters v. Teledyne Movible Offshore, Inc.

    776 F.2d 1304 (5th Cir. 1985)   Cited 325 times
    Holding that later service upon defendants or a lack of prejudice to defendants is not relevant in a good cause analysis
  2. Newby v. Enron Corp.

    284 F. App'x 146 (5th Cir. 2008)   Cited 79 times
    Finding that the district court acted within its discretion when it dismissed a case—even where the applicable statute of limitations barred refiling—because the plaintiff failed to serve the defendant after 1,000 days, including 126 days after receiving notice of defects from the defendants
  3. Rule 4 - Summons

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 4   Cited 68,414 times   121 Legal Analyses
    Holding that if defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on a motion, or on its own following notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made by a certain time
  4. Rule 6 - Computing and Extending Time; Time for Motion Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 6   Cited 47,972 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "if the last day [of a period] is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday."
  5. Rule 408 - Compromise Offers and Negotiations

    Fed. R. Evid. 408   Cited 4,241 times   43 Legal Analyses
    Holding that premature deliberations constituted an internal jury influence subject to the post-verdict restrictions of Rule 606(b)
  6. Rule 118 - Amendment

    Tex. R. Civ. P. 118   Cited 44 times

    At any time in its discretion and upon such notice and on such terms as it deems just, the court may allow any process or proof of service thereof to be amended, unless it clearly appears that material prejudice would result to the substantial rights of the party against whom the process issued. Tex. R. Civ. P. 118