§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, Respondent,v.Seth Rubenstein, Appellant. (And Another Action.)

Brief

17 Cited authorities

  1. Lillbask ex rel. Mauclaire v. Connecticut Department of Education

    397 F.3d 77 (2d Cir. 2005)   Cited 374 times
    Holding a general claim for "other such relief as the Court deems appropriate" cannot be read to include a compensatory award

  2. Coleman v. Daines

    2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 7222 (N.Y. 2012)   Cited 113 times
    Discussing a "hybrid CPLR article 78 proceeding and 42 USC § 1983 action"

  3. Seven Words LLC v. Network Solutions

    260 F.3d 1089 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 90 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding claims moot where appellant sought only injunctive and declaratory relief but failed to request damages

  4. Matter of Bickwid v. Deutsch

    87 N.Y.2d 862 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 76 times

    Argued November 29, 1995 Decided December 21, 1995 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, David Freundlich, J. Schapiro Reich, Lindenhurst (Perry S. Reich, Steven M. Schapiro and Wilma Kerner Miller, of counsel), for appellant. Respondent, precluded. MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the proceeding remitted to the Appellate Division for a determination on the merits. Appellant, an accountant and

  5. Katherine B. v. Cataldo

    5 N.Y.3d 196 (N.Y. 2005)   Cited 55 times
    Holding that N.Y. C.P.L. § 160.50 did not permit a prosecutor to have a record unsealed merely upon an ex parte motion demonstrating that justice so required

  6. Matter of Dondi

    63 N.Y.2d 331 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 99 times

    Argued September 13, 1984 Decided October 25, 1984 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department. Oren Root, Jr., and Patrick M. Wall for appellant. Robert H. Straus for respondent. Per Curiam. During the course of an investigation in an attorney disciplinary matter, the Grievance Committee may, upon an affirmation demonstrating necessity, gain an order from the Appellate Division permitting the unsealing of the records of a criminal action previously sealed

  7. Block v. Magee

    146 A.D.2d 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)   Cited 81 times

    January 30, 1989 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Weiner, J.). Ordered that the order and judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied. On September 21, 1979, the plaintiff William Block and the individual defendants, John Magee, Patrick Magee and Donald DeFilippis, executed a stockholders' agreement whereby they formed the defendant corporation, Rockland Racquetball Club Limited (hereinafter the club). The agreement provided, inter alia, that the plaintiff

  8. Matter of Joseph M

    82 N.Y.2d 128 (N.Y. 1993)   Cited 69 times
    Describing that purpose as “protecting exonerated individuals from the unwarranted stigma ... others could attach to dismissed criminal charges”

  9. Virag v. Hynes

    54 N.Y.2d 437 (N.Y. 1981)   Cited 98 times
    Recognizing that grand jury subpoenas can be "challenged by an affirmative showing of impropriety," including "bad faith"

  10. Matter of Camperlengo v. Blum

    56 N.Y.2d 251 (N.Y. 1982)   Cited 46 times
    Finding implied exception to the privilege in connection with investigation of Medicaid billing practices where the "Federal and State record-keeping and reporting requirements evidence a clear intention to abrogate the ... privilege to the extent necessary to satisfy the important public interest in seeing that Medicaid funds are properly applied"