11 Cited authorities

  1. Islamic Republic v. Pahlavi

    62 N.Y.2d 474 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 647 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Diverging from federal doctrine on whether alternative forum must be available to consider forum non conveniens claims
  2. Licci v. Lebanese Canadian Bank, SAL

    2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 7854 (N.Y. 2012)   Cited 175 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that New York courts could exercise personal jurisdiction over a Lebanese bank in connection with claims arising out of a rocket attack committed in Israel by a Lebanese terrorist group because the bank had routed wire transfers to the group through a New York bank
  3. Duffy v. Horton Mem. Hosp

    66 N.Y.2d 473 (N.Y. 1985)   Cited 164 times
    Noting that, ordinarily, the statute of limitations would apply to claims asserted against newly added parties who have "been a complete stranger to the suit up to the point of the requested amendment," but acknowledging that permitting the amendment to relate back to that defendant would not be at odds with the policies underlying the statute of limitations where "within the statutory period, . . . defendant is fully aware that a claim is being made against him with respect to the transaction or occurrence involved in the suit"
  4. World Point v. Credito

    225 A.D.2d 153 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)   Cited 55 times
    Concluding the motion court improvidently retained the action while an action was pending on the same claims in Italy
  5. BBIG Realty Corp. v. Ginsberg

    111 A.D.2d 91 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)   Cited 41 times

    May 21, 1985 Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Shorter, J.). This appeal arises out of negotiations concerning the proposed sale of third-party defendant Pontikes' cooperative apartment located at 425 East 85th Street in Manhattan. Pontikes retained the services of Byron Greenfield of the plaintiff BBIG Realty Corp. to sell the apartment at a price of $500,000, including commissions. Greenfield contacted a potential purchaser, the defendant and third-party plaintiff Ginsberg, who orally

  6. Langan v. Cabela

    289 A.D.2d 377 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)   Cited 3 times

    2000-06677 Submitted October 23, 2001. December 17, 2001. In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the third-party defendants Kevin L. McTague and Josephine McTague appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated June 6, 2000, as denied their cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint insofar as asserted against them, the third-party defendants Frank Blumetti, Rose Blumetti, Joseph

  7. DeLuca v. Lett

    173 A.D.2d 760 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)   Cited 5 times

    May 31, 1991 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.). Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from by the plaintiffs, without costs or disbursements; and it is further, Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as cross-appealed from by third-party defendant Schutz-Cohen Associates, Inc., on the law, without costs or disbursements, and upon searching the record, the third-party complaint insofar as it is asserted on behalf of the defendant third-party plaintiff

  8. Sosa v. Cumberland Swan, Inc.

    210 A.D.2d 156 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)   Cited 2 times

    December 20, 1994 Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Arber, J.). There is no merit to defendant's contention that service pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law § 253 (2) on defendant, Donald S. Mason, a Tennessee resident, was improper since plaintiff complied with the statute by serving the Secretary of State and sending notice of such service and a copy of the summons with notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, to defendant, and upon return of same to plaintiff by

  9. Schieve v. International Bus. Machines Corp.

    157 A.D.2d 924 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)   Cited 5 times

    January 18, 1990 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Broome County (Fischer, J.). Harvey, J. This suit arises from injuries sustained by plaintiff Michael P. Schieve (hereinafter plaintiff), a steel worker, when he fell from the steel beam he was installing into an uncovered cement-lined pit. It is conceded that no safety devices were in place that day, although it is alleged that a safety net had been in place previously but was removed prior to the date of the accident. Plaintiff had been working on

  10. Reese v. Harper Surface

    129 A.D.2d 159 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)   Cited 7 times
    In Reese v Harper Surface Finishing Sys. (129 AD2d 159, 164 [2d Dept 1987]), the Court concluded that an unauthorized foreign corporation did not violate Business Corporation Law § 1312 by bringing a third-party action for contribution and indemnification as part of its defense in an action brought against it in New York.