51 Cited authorities

  1. Lanza v. Wagner

    11 N.Y.2d 317 (N.Y. 1962)   Cited 1,302 times
    Holding a statute constitutional that provided for the mayor to appoint members to the Board of Education from a list of nominees provided by a selection board
  2. Albany Bldrs. v. Guilderland

    74 N.Y.2d 372 (N.Y. 1989)   Cited 145 times
    Holding Guilderland's local law was preempted by New York state law which provided a comprehensive scheme for funding road construction
  3. Kamhi v. Town of Yorktown

    547 N.E.2d 346 (N.Y. 1989)   Cited 87 times
    In Kamhi, the Court of Appeals decided that the Town of Yorktown's local law could be authorized under the provisions of Municipal Home Rule Law, § 10(1)(ii)(d)(3), the so-called supersession authority.
  4. City of New York v. State

    730 N.E.2d 920 (N.Y. 2000)   Cited 29 times

    Argued February 15, 2000 April 4, 2000 Appeal from Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department. Michael D. Hess, Corporation Counsel of New York City (Elizabeth I. Freedman, Leonard Koernerm Gail Rubin and Spencer Fisher of counsel), and Richard M. Weinberg, for appellants in the first above-entitled action. Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, New York City (Edward D. Johnson, Preeta D. Bansal and Marion R. Buchbinder of counsel), for respondents in the first above-entitled


    77 A.D.3d 121 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)   Cited 16 times

    No. 2008-08053. August 3, 2010. APPEAL from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Daniel Martin, J.), entered December 1, 2008. The order denied the motion by defendants/third-party plaintiffs for summary judgment on the first cause of action in the third-party complaint and, upon searching the record, awarded summary judgment to third-party defendants dismissing the third-party complaint. New York Tel. Co. v Supervisor of Town of N. Hempstead, 2008 NY Slip Op 33608[U], reversed. Jaspan Schlesinger

  6. Torre v. County of Nassau

    657 N.E.2d 486 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 32 times

    Argued September 12, 1995 Decided October 24, 1995 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Peter Fox Cohalan, J. Hinman, Straub, Pigors Manning, P.C., Albany (Bartley J. Costello, III, of counsel), for appellant. Snitow Pauley, New York City (Charles D. Cunningham, William H. Pauley III and William S. Norden of counsel), and Owen B. Walsh, County Attorney of Nassau County, Mineola, for respondents. Gaba Stober, P.C., Mineola (Louis D. Stober of counsel)

  7. Steel Los III v. Board

    2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 3513 (N.Y. 2008)   Cited 16 times

    No. 49. Argued March 11, 2008. decided April 24, 2008. APPEAL, in the first above-entitled matter, by permission of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, entered December 5, 2006 in consolidated proceedings pursuant to Real Property Tax Law article 7 and a related action. The Appellate Division affirmed so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Stephen A. Bucaria, J.; op 8 Misc

  8. Gizzo v. Town of Mamaroneck

    36 A.D.3d 162 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)   Cited 13 times

    No. 2004-11097. November 8, 2006. APPEAL from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (John R. LaCava, J.), entered November 12, 2004. The judgment dismissed the proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Police Commissioners of the Town of Mamaroneck which, after a hearing, terminated petitioner's employment as a police officer. Lovett Gould, LLP, White Plains ( Jonathan Lovett and Drita Nicaj of counsel), for appellant. Grotta, Glassman Hoffman

  9. Matter of Bowery Savings Bank v. Board of Assessors

    605 N.E.2d 363 (N.Y. 1992)   Cited 20 times

    Argued September 17, 1992 Decided October 29, 1992 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Leo F. McGinity. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton Garrison, New York City (Leslie Gordon Fagen, Aidan Synnott and Andrew B. Gelman of counsel), for appellants. Keoppel Martone Leistman Herman, Mineola (Donald F. Leistman of counsel), for Bowery Savings Bank and others, respondents. Farrell, Fritz, Caemmerer, Cleary, Barnosky Armentano, P.C., Uniondale (Dolores

  10. Matter of Smithtown v. Howell

    292 N.E.2d 10 (N.Y. 1972)   Cited 46 times
    In Town of Smithtown v. Howell, 31 N.Y.2d 365 (1972), the Court of Appeals explained that section 41 was designed to abrogate the common law rule that required the presence of the whole body to act.