Cardenas v. Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc.
231 F.R.D. 616 (D. Kan. 2005) Cited 31 timesFinding an interrogatory asking for each and every element of a product's design the plaintiffs contended was defective, asking the plaintiffs to identify how it was defective, and asking the manner in which their injuries were caused by each alleged defect to be sufficiently narrow
Jacks v. Directsat USA, LLC
Case No. 10 C 1707 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 1, 2011) Cited 2 times 1 Legal AnalysesCase No. 10 C 1707. February 1, 2011 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOAN GOTTSCHALL, District Judge The plaintiffs ask the court to compel the defendants to: (1) produce complete responses to Plaintiffs' Interrogatories Nos. 9, 10, and 14-22, (2) identify whether documents have already been produced in response to the plaintiffs' document requests and, if so, identify those documents by bates stamp number, and (3) conduct the proposed email key word search and produce responsive emails. II. ANALYSIS
Holmes v. Trustees of Purdue University
Case No. 4:06 CV 114 (N.D. Ind. Mar. 5, 2008) Cited 2 timesCase No. 4:06 CV 114. March 5, 2008 OPINION AND ORDER ANDREW RODOVICH, Magistrate Judge This matter is before the court on the Motion to Extend Deadlines, Motion to Compel Plaintiff's Discovery Responses and Deposition of Plaintiff filed by the defendants, Trustees of Purdue University, Debra J. Steiner, and William Miller, M.D., on January 29, 2008. (DE 50, 52) For the reasons set forth below, the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Background The parties generally agree upon an extension
Rule 11 - Signing Pleadings, Motions, and Other Papers; Representations to the Court; Sanctions
Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 Cited 35,634 times 139 Legal AnalysesHolding an "unrepresented party" to the same standard as an attorney
Rule 33 - Interrogatories to Parties
Fed. R. Civ. P. 33 Cited 10,864 times 21 Legal AnalysesAdopting Rule 30(b)