§Why CasetextPricing

Doe et al v. Boland

Memorandum of Opinion and Order dismissing with prejudice 22 Amended Third party complaint

4 Cited authorities

  1. Catz v. Chalker

    142 F.3d 279 (6th Cir. 1998)   Cited 423 times
    Holding that attorneys are not state actors

  2. Tingler v. Marshall

    716 F.2d 1109 (6th Cir. 1983)   Cited 160 times
    Holding that district court may not dismiss a plaintiff's suit sua sponte unless the court first gives the plaintiff the opportunity to amend or correct the deficiencies in the complaint, and recognizing that sua sponte dismissals "are not favored because they are unfair to the litigants and ultimately waste, rather than save judicial resources"

  3. Section 2252A - Certain activities relating to material constituting or containing child pornography

    18 U.S.C. § 2252A   Cited 5,915 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Making it a crime to knowingly receive the child pornography itself

  4. Section 2741.07 - Damages in civil action to enforce publicity right

    Ohio Rev. Code § 2741.07   Cited 7 times
    Setting forth available damages for violation of R.C. 2741.02