26 Cited authorities

Kach v. Hose ex rel. St. Moritz Security Services, Inc.
589 F.3d 626 (3d Cir. 2009) Cited 1,630 times
Holding that because the record "leaves no room for doubt that [defendant] was bent on a singularly personal frolic," his conduct was "not cognizable as state action for § 1983 purposes"
Klehr v. A. O. Smith Corp.
521 U.S. 179 (1997) Cited 540 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that "reasonable diligence" was required to invoke the doctrine of fraudulent concealment in the context of civil RICO by analogy to antitrust cases
Benak ex Rel. Alliance v. Alliance Capital
435 F.3d 396 (3d Cir. 2006) Cited 323 times
Holding dismissal is appropriate where "it appears to a certainty that no relief could be granted under any set of facts which could be proved."
Crouse v. Cyclops Industries
560 Pa. 394 (Pa. 2000) Cited 359 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the commencement of the limitations period may be determined as a matter of law "where the facts are so clear that reasonable minds cannot differ."
Cetel v. Kirwan Financial Group, Inc.
460 F.3d 494 (3d Cir. 2006) Cited 271 times
Holding plaintiffs gained "actual knowledge" when they learned they faced financial penalties in "direct contradiction" to what they had been told by fiduciary
Hamil v. Bashline
481 Pa. 256 (Pa. 1978) Cited 464 times 1 Legal Analyses
Establishing that the plaintiff bears the burden of proof
Cochran v. GAF Corp.
542 Pa. 210 (Pa. 1995) Cited 148 times
Holding that plaintiff did not exercise reasonable diligence as a matter of law because he did not seek medical help to ascertain the cause of his illness until four years after discovering the illness
Knopick v. Connelly
639 F.3d 600 (3d Cir. 2011) Cited 94 times
Finding that "[f]raudulent concealment would also toll the start of the statute of limitations on [a plaintiff's] malpractice claim until he reasonably should have been aware of his injury and its cause"
William A. Graham Co. v. Haughey
568 F.3d 425 (3d Cir. 2009) Cited 99 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding "possession of a copy of a work alone does not constitute copyright infringement"
Pension Trust Fund for Operating Eng'rs v. Mortg. Asset Securitization Transactions, Inc.
730 F.3d 263 (3d Cir. 2013) Cited 80 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding Merck applies to both the Exchange Act and Securities Act
Section 636 - Jurisdiction, powers, and temporary assignment
28 U.S.C. § 636 Cited 498,240 times 39 Legal Analyses
Holding that when a party fails to object to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, our review of the district court's resulting decision is for plain error so long as the party "has been served with notice that [this consequence] will result from a failure to object"
Rule 72 - Magistrate Judges: Pretrial Order
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 Cited 165,636 times 20 Legal Analyses
Granting a party fourteen days to object to a Magistrate Judge's non-dispositive order
Section 2255 - Civil remedy for personal injuries
18 U.S.C. § 2255 Cited 1,651 times 7 Legal Analyses
Defining "minor" as "any person under the age of 18 years"

Dicio v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA et al

26 Cited authorities

Holding that because the record "leaves no room for doubt that [defendant] was bent on a singularly personal frolic," his conduct was "not cognizable as state action for § 1983 purposes"

Holding that "reasonable diligence" was required to invoke the doctrine of fraudulent concealment in the context of civil RICO by analogy to antitrust cases

Holding dismissal is appropriate where "it appears to a certainty that no relief could be granted under any set of facts which could be proved."

Holding that the commencement of the limitations period may be determined as a matter of law "where the facts are so clear that reasonable minds cannot differ."

Holding plaintiffs gained "actual knowledge" when they learned they faced financial penalties in "direct contradiction" to what they had been told by fiduciary

Establishing that the plaintiff bears the burden of proof

Holding that plaintiff did not exercise reasonable diligence as a matter of law because he did not seek medical help to ascertain the cause of his illness until four years after discovering the illness

Finding that "[f]raudulent concealment would also toll the start of the statute of limitations on [a plaintiff's] malpractice claim until he reasonably should have been aware of his injury and its cause"

Holding "possession of a copy of a work alone does not constitute copyright infringement"

Holding Merck applies to both the Exchange Act and Securities Act

Holding that when a party fails to object to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, our review of the district court's resulting decision is for plain error so long as the party "has been served with notice that [this consequence] will result from a failure to object"

Granting a party fourteen days to object to a Magistrate Judge's non-dispositive order

Defining "minor" as "any person under the age of 18 years"