50 Cited authorities

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
477 U.S. 242 (1986) Cited 241,475 times 39 Legal Analyses
Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett
477 U.S. 317 (1986) Cited 220,853 times 41 Legal Analyses
Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"
Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio
475 U.S. 574 (1986) Cited 115,480 times 38 Legal Analyses
Holding that, on summary judgment, antitrust plaintiffs "must show that the inference of conspiracy is reasonable in light of the competing inferences of independent action or collusive action that could not have harmed" them
Bowden v. United States
106 F.3d 433 (D.C. Cir. 1997) Cited 551 times
Holding that when agency decides a case on the merits without mentioning timeliness, its failure to raise the issue of timeliness in the administrative process may lead to waiver of a timeliness defense
Cole v. Burns Int'l Sec. Servs.
105 F.3d 1465 (D.C. Cir. 1997) Cited 404 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that a security worker at train station was not excluded
Intel Corp. v. VIA Technologies, Inc.
319 F.3d 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2003) Cited 208 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding in a contract dispute that “the plain meaning of the word ‘required’ is the opposite of that of the word ‘optional’ ”
Oakwood v. State
539 F.3d 373 (6th Cir. 2008) Cited 172 times
Holding that Ambase is inapposite
Hillside Metro Associates, LLC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank
747 F.3d 44 (2d Cir. 2014) Cited 96 times
Holding that a lessor lacked prudential standing to litigate whether liabilities were assigned under a purchase and assumption agreement because the lessor was neither a contracting party nor a third-party beneficiary under the agreement
Commissioner v. Indianapolis Power Light Co.
493 U.S. 203 (1990) Cited 59 times 1 Legal Analyses
Requiring "some guarantee" to satisfy the complete dominion and control condition, rather than an absolute guarantee
Interface Kanner, LLC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
704 F.3d 927 (11th Cir. 2013) Cited 90 times
Finding that third party to the WaMu P&A Agreement between the FDIC and Chase lacks standing to enforce its construction of the agreement
Rule 56 - Summary Judgment
Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 Cited 336,515 times 161 Legal Analyses
Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
Rule 1 - Scope and Purpose
Fed. R. Civ. P. 1 Cited 15,797 times 51 Legal Analyses
Recognizing the federal rules of civil procedure should be employed to promote the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding"
Section 1821 - Insurance Funds
12 U.S.C. § 1821 Cited 2,963 times 56 Legal Analyses
Granting FDIC standing to bring civil actions for money damages against the Bank's directors as the successor
Section 1813 - Definitions
12 U.S.C. § 1813 Cited 381 times 28 Legal Analyses
Defining "State bank supervisor" as state officer, agency, or other entity with primary regulatory authority over state banks
Section 1831g - Contracts between depository institutions and persons providing goods, products, or services
12 U.S.C. § 1831g Cited 1 times
(a) In general An insured depository institution may not enter into a written or oral contract with any person to provide goods, products, or services to or for the benefit of such depository institution if the performance of such contract would adversely affect the safety or soundness of the institution. (b) Rulemaking The Corporation shall prescribe such regulations and issue such orders, including definitions consistent with this section, as may be necessary to administer and carry out the purposes
Section 330.3 - General principles
12 C.F.R. § 330.3 Cited 21 times
Including regulatory exceptions not relevant here

Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for the Trusts v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, et al

50 Cited authorities

Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"

Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"

Holding that, on summary judgment, antitrust plaintiffs "must show that the inference of conspiracy is reasonable in light of the competing inferences of independent action or collusive action that could not have harmed" them

Holding that when agency decides a case on the merits without mentioning timeliness, its failure to raise the issue of timeliness in the administrative process may lead to waiver of a timeliness defense

Holding that a security worker at train station was not excluded

Holding in a contract dispute that “the plain meaning of the word ‘required’ is the opposite of that of the word ‘optional’ ”

Holding that Ambase is inapposite

Holding that a lessor lacked prudential standing to litigate whether liabilities were assigned under a purchase and assumption agreement because the lessor was neither a contracting party nor a third-party beneficiary under the agreement

Requiring "some guarantee" to satisfy the complete dominion and control condition, rather than an absolute guarantee

Finding that third party to the WaMu P&A Agreement between the FDIC and Chase lacks standing to enforce its construction of the agreement

Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

Recognizing the federal rules of civil procedure should be employed to promote the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding"

Granting FDIC standing to bring civil actions for money damages against the Bank's directors as the successor

Defining "State bank supervisor" as state officer, agency, or other entity with primary regulatory authority over state banks

Including regulatory exceptions not relevant here