Department of Fair Employment and Housing v. Law School Admission Council IncRESPONSE to re NoticeN.D. Cal.February 4, 2015 DFEH v. LSAC, No. 3:12-cv-1830-EMC LSAC RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF ISSUANCE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DOCUMENT PREPARED ON RECYCLED PAPER ROBERT E. DARBY (BAR NO. 70576) NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP 555 South Flower Street, 41st Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 892-9200 Facsimile: (213) 892-9494 robert.darby@nortonrosefulbright.com ROBERT A. BURGOYNE (pro hac vice) CAROLINE M. MEW (pro hac vice) NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP 801 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 Telephone: (202) 662-0200 Facsimile: (202) 662-4643 robert.burgoyne@nortonrosefulbright.com caroline.mew@nortonrosefulbright.com Attorneys for Defendant LAW SCHOOL ADMISSION COUNCIL, INC. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION THE DEPARTMENT OF FAIR EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING, Plaintiff, v. LAW SCHOOL ADMISSION COUNCIL, INC., Defendant. No. CV 12-1830-EMC THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. LAW SCHOOL ADMISSION COUNCIL, INC., Defendant. LSAC RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF ISSUANCE On February 3, 2015, plaintiffs Department of Fair Employment and Housing and the United States filed a Notice informing the Court that the Best Practices Panel had issued its final report, and included with their Notice a copy of the Final Report of the “Best Practices” Panel (“Final Report”). The plaintiffs did not file a copy of the Best Practices Minority Report (“Minority Report”) or the Final Ex Parte Log of “Best Practices” Panel (“Ex Parte Log”), documents which are identified as attachments to the Final Report. See D.E. 209-1 at p. 1, n.1 Case3:12-cv-01830-EMC Document210 Filed02/04/15 Page1 of 2 91284564.1 - 1 - DFEH v. LSAC, No. 3:12-cv-1830-EMC LSAC RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF ISSUANCE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DOCUMENT PREPARED ON RECYCLED PAPER and p. 2. It is not clear why plaintiffs filed a Notice and a copy of the Final Report with the Court, insofar as the case is closed and the Consent Decree does not provide for the filing of the Panel’s report with the Court. Nevertheless, if the Panel’s Final Report is to be made a part of the record, then the Panel’s complete report should be on file. Accordingly, the complete Final Report, including the Minority Report and the Ex Parte Log, are being filed herewith. Dated: February 4, 2015 Respectfully submitted, NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP By /s/ Robert A. Burgoyne Attorneys for Defendant Law School Admission Council, Inc. Case3:12-cv-01830-EMC Document210 Filed02/04/15 Page2 of 2