§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Appellant,v.Raymond Crespo, Respondent.

Brief

33 Cited authorities

  1. Serfass v. United States

    420 U.S. 377 (1975)   Cited 966 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that jeopardy had not attached when district court dismissed the indictment because petitioner had not been put to trial

  2. People v. Peque

    2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 7651 (N.Y. 2013)   Cited 624 times
    Holding that New York trial courts must inform the defendant of the immigration consequences of pleading guilty to a felony and that a failure to do so could provide a basis for withdrawing or vacating the guilty plea

  3. People v. Hobson

    39 N.Y.2d 479 (N.Y. 1976)   Cited 457 times
    Finding constitutional prohibition against use of statements taken without notice to defense counsel, buttressing suppression and reversal with discussion of DR 7-104 violation

  4. People v. Velasco

    77 N.Y.2d 469 (N.Y. 1991)   Cited 280 times
    Holding that defendant's presence not required for charging conference in robing room attended by attorneys for both sides involving only questions of law and procedure

  5. People v. Arroyo

    98 N.Y.2d 101 (N.Y. 2002)   Cited 191 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Arroyo, we expressly noted that "we have eschewed application of any rigid formula and endorsed the use of a nonformalistic, flexible inquiry" (Arroyo, 98 NY2d at 104).

  6. People v. McIntyre

    36 N.Y.2d 10 (N.Y. 1974)   Cited 387 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding the defendant's motion timely because it was made before the prosecution's opening statement

  7. Hill v. Curtin

    792 F.3d 670 (6th Cir. 2015)   Cited 119 times
    Upholding a state court's decision denying a self-representation request made on first day of trial as untimely, even without a Faretta inquiry

  8. United States v. Walker

    142 F.3d 103 (2d Cir. 1998)   Cited 166 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a defendant may be held liable as an aider or abettor to an offense under 21 U.S.C. § 848(e)

  9. State v. Cornell

    179 Ariz. 314 (Ariz. 1994)   Cited 130 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, despite finding the court ought to have given a specific instruction regarding the prosecutor's improper remarks that the defendant would be set free if acquitted by reason of temporary insanity, such a brief event did not constitute error requiring reversal considering the weight of evidence against the defendant

  10. People v. Hightower

    2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8960 (N.Y. 2011)   Cited 78 times
    In Hightower, the Court reversed the judgment of conviction and dismissed an accusatory instrument, holding that "[a]though the information in th[at] case described the events with enough clarity to provide reasonable cause that defendant was engaged in [the class B misdemeanors charged therein],... it was jurisdictionally defective as to the crime of which defendant was actually convicted—petit larceny," a class A misdemeanor (18 N.Y.3d at 254, 938 N.Y.S.2d 500, 961 N.E.2d 1111).