54 Cited authorities

  1. Faretta v. California

    422 U.S. 806 (1975)   Cited 10,457 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to self-representation
  2. Payne v. Tennessee

    501 U.S. 808 (1991)   Cited 2,415 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding that admission of victim impact evidence at death penalty sentencing phase does not per se violate the Eighth Amendment
  3. McKaskle v. Wiggins

    465 U.S. 168 (1984)   Cited 2,071 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that pro se defendant's right to self-representation was not violated by the presence of a court-appointed standby counsel
  4. State v. Stenson

    132 Wn. 2d 668 (Wash. 1997)   Cited 1,276 times
    Holding that an irreconcilable conflict may justify appointing new counsel, but that a "general loss of confidence or trust is not sufficient to substitute new counsel" under the Sixth Amendment
  5. Adams v. U.S. ex Rel. McCann

    317 U.S. 269 (1942)   Cited 1,779 times
    Holding that ". . . an accused, in the exercise of a free and intelligent choice, and with the considered approval of the court, may waive trial by jury . . . There is nothing in the Constitution to prevent an accused from choosing to have his fate tried before a judge without a jury . . ."
  6. People v. Peque

    2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 7651 (N.Y. 2013)   Cited 455 times
    Holding that New York trial courts must inform the defendant of the immigration consequences of pleading guilty to a felony and that a failure to do so could provide a basis for withdrawing or vacating the guilty plea
  7. Randall v. Sorrell

    548 U.S. 230 (2006)   Cited 168 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding Vermont's expenditure limitations unconstitutional under the First Amendment
  8. People v. Maracle

    2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 5121 (N.Y. 2012)   Cited 320 times

    2012-06-27 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Amber MARACLE, Appellant. (Appeal No. 1.). The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Amber Maracle, Appellant. (Appeal No. 2.). Lipsitz Green Scime Cambria, LLP, Buffalo (Timothy P. Murphy of counsel), for appellant in the first and second above-entitled actions. Frank A. Sedita, III, District Attorney, Buffalo (Matthew B. Powers and Donna A. Milling of counsel), for respondent in the first and second above-entitled actions

  9. People v. Sides

    75 N.Y.2d 822 (N.Y. 1990)   Cited 402 times
    Requiring a new trial where indigent defendant requested a change of counsel and where record indicated a possible irreconcilable conflict between the defendant and his assigned attorney
  10. People v. Bing

    76 N.Y.2d 331 (N.Y. 1990)   Cited 295 times
    In Bing, the New York Court of Appeals held that a criminal defendant, who had been represented by counsel on prior pending unrelated charges, was not deprived of the right to counsel under the State Constitution where, in the absence of counsel, the defendant waived his or her Miranda rights and made statements in response to police questioning on matters unrelated to the prior pending charge.