18 Cited authorities

  1. Vermont Teddy Bear Co. v. 538 Madison Realty Co.

    1 N.Y.3d 470 (N.Y. 2004)   Cited 554 times
    Finding no intent to add terms where sophisticated parties could have added a term, but failed to do so
  2. Beal Sav. Bank v. Sommer

    8 N.Y.3d 318 (N.Y. 2007)   Cited 449 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a contract should not be interpreted so as to render any portion of it meaningless
  3. Hahn Auto. Warehouse, Inc. v. Am. Zurich Ins. Co.

    2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 2344 (N.Y. 2012)   Cited 109 times
    Assuming there is a right to payment when the party has the contractual right to, and does, demand unconditional payment
  4. John J. Kassner & Co. v. City of New York

    46 N.Y.2d 544 (N.Y. 1979)   Cited 273 times
    Holding that "the cause of action accrues and the Statute of Limitations begins to run from the time of the breach" of a contract
  5. Quadrant Structured Prods. Co. v. Vertin

    2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 4114 (N.Y. 2014)   Cited 92 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that no-action clause applied to securityholder's contract claims where clause precluded suits “upon or under or with respect to this Indenture”
  6. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Quicken Loans Inc.

    810 F.3d 861 (2d Cir. 2015)   Cited 64 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming decision to dismiss good-faith-and-fair-dealing-claim as duplicative of breach-of-contract claim
  7. Continental Casualty Co. v. Stronghold Insurance Co.

    77 F.3d 16 (2d Cir. 1996)   Cited 48 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Stating that a claim founded on an express contract for indemnity against loss “generally accrues when the indemnitee actually suffers a loss”
  8. Bulova Watch v. Celotex Corp.

    46 N.Y.2d 606 (N.Y. 1979)   Cited 78 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the six-year statute of limitations period began anew with each new leak of a roof where contractor had made 20–year guarantee to repair roof
  9. New England Mut Ins v. Caruso

    73 N.Y.2d 74 (N.Y. 1989)   Cited 52 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, under New York law, insurer was barred from asserting invalidity of a policy because the statutory incontestability period had expired before the insured died
  10. Signature Realty, Inc. v. Tallman

    814 N.E.2d 429 (N.Y. 2004)   Cited 21 times
    In Signature Realty, Inc. v. Tallman (2 NY3d 810), the Court of Appeals held that nothing in the parties' agreement limited the commission to the initial lease period.
  11. s 500.13 - Content and form of briefs in normal course appeals

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.13

    (a) Content. All briefs shall conform to the requirements of section 500.1 of this Part and contain a table of contents, a table of cases and authorities, questions presented, point headings, and, if necessary, a disclosure statement pursuant to section 500.1(f) of this Part. Such disclosure statement shall be included before the table of contents in the party's principal brief. Appellant's brief shall include a statement showing that the court has jurisdiction to entertain the appeal and to review