Foman v. Davis
371 U.S. 178 (1962) Cited 28,549 times 4 Legal AnalysesHolding that an appeal was improperly dismissed when the record as a whole — including a timely but incomplete notice of appeal and a premature but complete notice — revealed the orders petitioner sought to appeal
Moore v. Baker
989 F.2d 1129 (11th Cir. 1993) Cited 134 timesHolding that "a justifying reason must be apparent for denial of a motion to amend"
Shipner v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.
868 F.2d 401 (11th Cir. 1989) Cited 129 timesHolding that although district courts have discretion to deny leave to amend, they may only do so for a "substantial reason"
CONSUMER SOLUTIONS REO, LLC v. HILLERY
No. C-08-4357 EMC (N.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2010) Cited 10 timesNo. C-08-4357 EMC. January 8, 2010 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF CONSUMER SOLUTION'S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT HILLERY'S AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM; AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART COUNTER-CLAIM DEFENDANT SAXON MORTGAGE SERVICES' MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT HILLERY'S AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM (Docket Nos. 72, 78) EDWARD CHEN, Magistrate Judge Previously, the Court issued an order granting in part and denying in part Counter-Defendant Consumer Solutions REO, LLC's motion to
Section 1641 - Liability of assignees
15 U.S.C. § 1641 Cited 1,337 times 14 Legal AnalysesAdopting RESPA's meaning of “servicer,” 12 U.S.C. § 2605