13 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 195,191 times   262 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the sufficiency of the allegations is a legal question so appellate courts have jurisdiction to consider it on appeal from denial of qualified immunity
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 209,562 times   342 Legal Analyses
    Holding that conclusory allegations that the defendants acted unlawfully were insufficient to state a claim
  3. Landgraf v. USI Film Prods.

    511 U.S. 244 (1994)   Cited 3,485 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that amendment to Title VII of Civil Rights Act did not apply retroactively, even to cases pending on appeal
  4. Iles v. de Jongh

    638 F.3d 169 (3d Cir. 2011)   Cited 72 times
    Explaining that "a state employee may be sued in his official capacity only for prospective injunctive relief, because official-capacity actions for prospective relief are not treated as actions against the State."
  5. REX MEDICAL L.P. v. ANGIOTECH PHARMACEUTICALS

    754 F. Supp. 2d 616 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)   Cited 46 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "being forced to comply with contractual obligations that a party voluntarily entered into is simply not the sort of 'damage' that is compensable at law"
  6. Ancile Inv. Co. Ltd. v. Archer Daniels Midland Co.

    784 F. Supp. 2d 296 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)   Cited 25 times
    Finding that an implied contract requires contractual elements and inference that the parties intended to agree
  7. Kania v. Potter

    358 F. App'x 338 (3d Cir. 2009)   Cited 20 times
    Finding that speculation “is insufficient to defeat summary judgment”
  8. Innovative Biodefense, Inc. v. VSP Techs., Inc.

    12 Civ. 3710 (ER) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 3, 2013)   Cited 12 times

    12 Civ. 3710 (ER) 07-03-2013 INNOVATIVE BIODEFENSE, INC., Plaintiff, v. VSP TECHNOLOGIES, INC., SAN-MAR LABORATORIES, INC., and CARLO MICCERI Defendants. Edgardo Ramos, U.S.D.J. OPINION AND ORDER This action stems from a series of contracts governing the sublicense of patented technology used to manufacture hand sanitizer. Defendant VSP Technologies, Inc. ("VSP") holds the master license to the intellectual property, and Plaintiff Innovative BioDefense, Inc. ("Plaintiff" or "IBD") currently holds

  9. Hardee-Guerra v. Shire Pharmaceuticals

    737 F. Supp. 2d 318 (E.D. Pa. 2010)   Cited 12 times
    Reiterating presumption of at-will employment
  10. Tax Matrix Technologies, LLC v. Wegmans Food Markets, Inc.

    154 F. Supp. 3d 157 (E.D. Pa. 2016)   Cited 6 times
    Allowing contract claim to proceed in case where "the parties continued to move forward with multiple projects governed by" the contract "even after th[e] case was filed"
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 269,826 times   783 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss