11 Cited authorities

  1. In re Agent Orange

    517 F.3d 76 (2d Cir. 2008)   Cited 359 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the district court erred in denying leave to amend because plaintiffs "were entitled to amend their complaint as a matter of right without leave of the district court"
  2. Obiajulu v. City of Rochester, Dept. of Law

    166 F.R.D. 293 (W.D.N.Y. 1996)   Cited 83 times
    Finding reasonable copying costs to be charged to plaintiff could not exceed 10 cents per page
  3. U2 HOME ENTERTAINMENT v. HONG WEI INTL. TRADING

    04 Civ. 6189 (JFK) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 13, 2007)   Cited 50 times

    04 Civ. 6189 (JFK). August 13, 2007 OPINION ORDER JOHN KEENAN, Senior District Judge This Opinion addresses Defendants' objection to a discovery order issued by Magistrate Judge Maas. On January 5, 2007, Judge Maas issued an Order in this case directing, among other things, that fact discovery be completed by April 13, 2007 (Dkt. #30). On April 26, 2007, in response to a request by Defendants Hong Wei International Trading, Inc. and Jixong Ni (collectively, "Defendants") request for an extension

  4. In re Salomon Analyst Level 3 Litigation

    350 F. Supp. 2d 477 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)   Cited 49 times
    Finding pleading standard met for "buy" ratings issued after analyst sent internal e-mail stating that the stocks "must not remain buys"
  5. Yapuna v. Global Horizons Manpower Inc.

    254 F.R.D. 407 (E.D. Wash. 2008)   Cited 5 times

    [Copyrighted Material Omitted] [Copyrighted Material Omitted] Brad J. Moore, Keith Leon Kessler, Stritmatter Kessler Whelan Withey Coluccio, Seattle, WA, Jeffry Keith Finer, Jeffry Finer Law Office, Breean Lawrence Beggs, Spokane, WA, for Plaintiffs. I. Randolph S. Shiner, I. Randolph S. Shiner, Esq., San Diego, CA, Matthew S. Gibbs, Los Angeles, CA, Gary Edward Lofland, Lofland & Associates, Ryan Mark Edgley, Edgley Law Office PS, Brendan Victor Monahan, Stokes Lawrence Velikanje Moore & Shore,

  6. Cendant Mortgage Corp. v. Saxon Nat. Mortg

    492 F. Supp. 2d 119 (E.D.N.Y. 2007)   Cited 4 times

    No. 99 CV 3161 (ADS) (MLO). April 3, 2007. Certilman, Balin, Adler Hyman, LLP, East Meadow, NY (Candace Reid Gladston, Thomas J. McNamara, of Counsel), for Plaintiff. Wolf Wolf, Hauppauge, NY (Edward L. Wolf, of Counsel), Poli Lamura, Northport, NY (John G. Poli, of Counsel), Dollinger, Gonski Grossman, Carle Place, NY (Matthew Dollinger, of Counsel), for the Defendant. MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge Currently pending before the Court are objections by the Plaintiff Cendant

  7. Loeffler v. Staten Island University Hospital

    95 CV 4549 (SJ) (RLM) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 16, 2010)   Cited 1 times

    95 CV 4549 (SJ) (RLM). March 16, 2010 LAW OFFICES OF ALAN J. RICH, New York, NY, By: Alan J. Rich, Esq., Baree N. Hassett, Esq., Attorneys for Plaintiffs. GARFUNKEL, WILD TRAVIS, P.C., Great Neck, NY, By: Roy W. Breitenbach, Esq., Leonard M. Rosenberg, Esq., Attorneys for Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER STERLING JOHNSON JR., District Judge Plaintiffs Robert A. Loeffler ("Robert"), Josephine Loeffler ("Josephine"), Kristy Loeffler, and Robert C. Loeffler (collectively "Plaintiffs") commenced this

  8. Equal Employment Opportunity Comm. v. Dillon Companies

    Civil Action No. 09-cv-02237-ZLW-MEH (D. Colo. Aug. 13, 2010)

    Civil Action No. 09-cv-02237-ZLW-MEH. August 13, 2010 ORDER MICHAEL HEGARTY, Magistrate Judge Pending before the Court is Plaintiff EEOC's Motion to Compel Discovery [filed June 9, 2010; docket #44]. The motion is referred to this Court for disposition. (Docket #45.) The matter is fully briefed, and oral argument would not assist the Court in its adjudication. For the reasons stated below, the Court grants in part and denies in part Plaintiff's motion, as follows. Plaintiff brings this action on

  9. Miller v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company

    No. CV-09-1954-PHX-FJM (D. Ariz. Jul. 23, 2010)

    No. CV-09-1954-PHX-FJM. July 23, 2010 ORDER FREDERICK MARTONE, District Judge The court has before it plaintiffs' motion to amend (doc. 32), defendant's response (doc. 43), and plaintiffs' reply (doc. 65). We also have before us defendant's motion to limit plaintiffs' standing to American Standard insureds (doc. 44), plaintiffs' response and cross motion to file second amended complaint (doc. 71), defendant's response and reply (doc. 72), and plaintiffs' reply (doc. 74). Plaintiffs alleged in their

  10. Fleming v. City of New York

    233 F. Supp. 2d 613 (S.D.N.Y. 2002)   Cited 4 times

    No. 01 Civ. 8885 (RCC)(RLE) December 4, 2002 OPINION AND ORDER RONALD L. ELLIS, United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Before this Court is a motion by plaintiff Rita Fleming ("Fleming") seeking to compel production by defendants of certain document requests. For the following reasons, Fleming's motion to compel is DENIED IN PART, GRANTED IN PART and WITHDRAWN IN PART. II. BACKGROUND Fleming began her employment with the New York City Police Department ("NYPD") on July 1, 1998, and from

  11. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 94,303 times   646 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37