No. 151. Argued October 18, 2006. Decided November 21, 2006. APPEAL, by permission of an Associate Judge of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, entered October 11, 2005. The Appellate Division affirmed a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.), which had convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of two counts of murder in the second degree. People v. Romero, 22 AD3d 287, affirmed. Center
Uniform traffic tickets conforming to the following specifications may be issued for traffic violations occurring prior to January 1, 1970, and must be used for traffic violations occurring on and after January 1, 1970. No variations from the prescribed specifications shall be permitted unless prior written approval is obtained from the commissioner. (a) It shall be a multi-copy packet, with interleaved carbons, conforming to the following: (1) Each part shall be between 4 and 41/4 inches wide and
When an alleged traffic violator is issued a uniform traffic ticket, the police officer shall sign and print his name on part I of the packet. Such signature constitutes the affirmation of the information under penalty of perjury. The officer shall deliver part III or part V, whichever is appropriate, to the alleged violator, and shall deliver parts I and II, with carbon still in place, to the court or traffic violations bureau in which the alleged violator is notified to appear. He shall deliver
(a) Content. All briefs shall conform to the requirements of section 500.1 of this Part and contain a table of contents, a table of cases and authorities, questions presented, point headings, and, if necessary, a disclosure statement pursuant to section 500.1(f) of this Part. Such disclosure statement shall be included before the table of contents in the party's principal brief. Appellant's brief shall include a statement showing that the court has jurisdiction to entertain the appeal and to review