161 Cited authorities

  1. Obergefell v. Hodges

    135 S. Ct. 2584 (2015)   Cited 541 times   54 Legal Analyses
    Holding that laws prohibiting same-sex marriage "impos[e] disability on gays and lesbians"
  2. Small v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.

    94 N.Y.2d 43 (N.Y. 1999)   Cited 608 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where the underlying tort theory fails, "there is no independent tort to provide a basis for liability under . . . concert of action, conspiracy, and aiding and abetting theories"
  3. Colavito v. New York Organ Donor Network, Inc.

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 9320 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 467 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that survivors' limited right to control the burial of a deceased relative did not imply a general, common-law property right in body parts
  4. Board of Education v. Allen

    392 U.S. 236 (1968)   Cited 447 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the lending by a state to parochial school students of non-sectarian textbooks available to all students is permissible under the Establishment Clause
  5. Sharp v. Kosmalski

    40 N.Y.2d 119 (N.Y. 1976)   Cited 752 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding confidential relationship existed between transferor and transferee
  6. Matter of Scherbyn v. Boces

    77 N.Y.2d 753 (N.Y. 1991)   Cited 451 times
    Finding that Article 78 review of a quasi-judicial hearing is a certiorari proceeding, not a mandamus to review proceeding, and therefore "substantial evidence" rather than "arbitrary and capricious" is the standard of review
  7. Andon v. 302-304 Mott Street Associates

    94 N.Y.2d 740 (N.Y. 2000)   Cited 335 times
    In Andon, the defendant's expert failed to identify or attach the scientific studies he relied upon to support his opinions on the significance of maternal IQ in evaluating lead paint injury causation (Andon, 94 NY2d at 746).
  8. Simonds v. Simonds

    45 N.Y.2d 233 (N.Y. 1978)   Cited 514 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an interest obtained through an agreement supported by consideration “is superior to that of a named beneficiary who has given no consideration”
  9. State v. Seventh Regiment Fund, Inc.

    98 N.Y.2d 249 (N.Y. 2002)   Cited 249 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding demand futile where circumstances show good-faith possessor knows he has no right to goods
  10. Klostermann v. Cuomo

    61 N.Y.2d 525 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 376 times
    In Klostermann, the public agencies involved were in repeated noncompliance with the command of Mental Hygiene Law § 29.15 (g), which required preparation of a written service plan, with prescribed contents, for every person discharged from state psychiatric hospitals.
  11. Section 635.1 - Reimbursement for medical assistance (MA)

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 18 § 635.1

    (a) Reimbursement for services provided to recipients of MA shall be claimed on schedules and formats prescribed by the department and in accordance with instructions of the department. Any amounts which are federally reimbursable pursuant to title XIX of the Social Security Act or another Federal program or activity must be claimed in a manner that results in the greatest proportion of Federal participation or alternatively must be claimed in a manner that does not increase the amount of State reimbursement