§Why CasetextPricing

Richard N. Golden, Respondent,v.Citibank, N.A., Appellant.

Brief

15 Cited authorities

  1. Burke v. Crosson

    85 N.Y.2d 10 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 153 times

    Argued January 5, 1995 Decided February 9, 1995 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Rosemary S. Pooler, J. Dennis C. Vacco, Attorney-General, Albany (Frank K. Walsh, Jerry Boone and Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for Edward Regan and another, appellants. Michael Colodner, New York City, John Eiseman and John J. Sullivan for Matthew T. Crosson, appellant. Julian Pertz, P.C., Utica (Robert F. Julian of counsel), for respondents. TITONE, J. Plaintiffs, three Onondaga County Court Judges, commenced

  2. State Farm Mut. Ins. v. Westlake

    35 N.Y.2d 587 (N.Y. 1974)   Cited 71 times
    In Westlake, an action was brought by an insured driver owner and his passenger wife against the owner and operator of the other car for her injuries in an automobile accident.

  3. EA Management v. JP Morgan Chase Bank

    655 F.3d 573 (6th Cir. 2011)   Cited 10 times
    Stating that "we can affirm on any basis supported by the record"

  4. Transcontinental Holding v. First Banks

    299 S.W.3d 629 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010)   Cited 4 times
    Explaining difference between cashier's checks and checks drawn on account of bank customer

  5. U.S. Printnet Inc. v. Chemung Canal Trust Co.

    270 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)   Cited 7 times

    March 2, 2000 Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Ellison, J.), entered November 13, 1998 in Chemung County, which, inter alia, granted defendants' motion for partial summary judgment dismissing the third cause of action in the complaint. Fishman Neil (Mark Kenyon, Vitanza, Aaron Fitzgerald P.C., Binghamton, of counsel), New York City, for appellants. Levene, Gouldin Thompson LLP (John H. Hartman of counsel), Binghamton, for respondents. Before: MERCURE, J.P., CREW III, PETERS, SPAIN and GRAFFEO

  6. Crossland Savings, FSB v. Foxwood & Southern Co.

    202 A.D.2d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)   Cited 11 times

    March 21, 1994 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Irving Aronin, J.). Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof which granted the cross motion with respect to the principal sum of $20,000 and substituting therefor a provision denying so much of the cross motion as related to the principal sum of $20,000; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. On February 1, 1991, Aroneau and Madden entered into

  7. Banco Ganadero y Agricola v. Soc. Nat. Bk., Cleve.

    418 F. Supp. 520 (N.D. Ohio 1976)   Cited 21 times

    Civ. A. No. C 75-505. August 2, 1976. William S. Burton, Arter Hadden, Cleveland, Ohio, Woodrow W. Bean II, Bean, Zaveleta Rosado, C.P., El Paso, Tex., for plaintiffs. S. Stuart Eilers, Thompson, Hine Flory, Cleveland, Ohio, for defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WILLIAM K. THOMAS, District Judge. With jurisdiction in this court based upon diversity of citizenship, Banco Ganadero y Agricola, S.A., Agua Prieta, Sonora, Mexico (hereafter Banco G) sues Society National Bank of Cleveland (SNB) for $73

  8. Gates v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust

    98 A.D.2d 829 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)   Cited 10 times

    December 1, 1983 Cross appeals from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Pennock, J.), entered July 15, 1982 in Albany County, which denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in lieu of a complaint and defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. At issue on this appeal is whether Special Term erred in denying the parties' cross motions for summary judgment in plaintiff's action based upon four cashier's checks issued by defendant to plaintiff's principal

  9. Wilmington Trust Co. v. Delaware Auto Sales

    271 A.2d 41 (Del. 1970)   Cited 20 times

    November 4, 1970. Upon appeal from Superior Court. Reversed. Rodney M. Layton and Jane R. Roth, of Richards, Layton Finger, Wilmington, for defendant below, appellant. Jay H. Conner, of Conner Daley, Wilmington, for plaintiff below, appellee. CAREY and HERRMANN, JJ., and SHORT, Vice-Chancellor, sitting. CAREY, Justice. This is an appeal by Wilmington Trust Company, defendant below, from a judgment in Superior Court based upon a holding that plaintiff below, Delaware Auto Sales, was a holder in due

  10. International Furn. Dist. v. First Ga. Bank

    294 S.E.2d 732 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982)   Cited 8 times
    Holding that where remitter paid for cashier's check with a personal check upon which a stop payment order had already been issued, the bank could assert the defense of failure of consideration and dishonor its cashier's check

  11. Section 500.22 - Motions for permission to appeal in civil cases

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.22   Cited 43 times

    (a) Filing and notice. In addition to the submission in digital format required by subsection 500.22(e) of this section, movant shall file an original and one copy of its motion, unless permitted to proceed pursuant to subsection 500.21(g), with proof of service of one copy on each other party. The motion shall be noticed for a return date in compliance with CPLR 5516 and subsection 500.21(b) of this Part. (b) Content. The motion shall be a single document, bound on the left, and shall contain in

  12. Section 670.6 - Motions-reargue; resettle; amend; leave to appeal; admission pro hac vice

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 670.6   Cited 13 times

    (a) Motions to reargue, resettle or amend. Motions to reargue a cause or motion, or to resettle or amend a decision and order, shall be made within 30 days after service of a copy of the decision and order determining the cause or motion, with notice of its entry, except that for good cause shown, the court may consider any such motion when made at a later date. The papers in support of every such motion shall concisely state the points claimed to have been overlooked or misapprehended by the court

  13. Section 500.1 - General requirements

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 22 § 500.1   Cited 1 times

    (a) All papers shall comply with applicable statutes and rules, particularly the signing requirement of section 130-1.1 -a of this Title. (b) Papers filed. Papers filed means briefs, papers submitted pursuant to sections 500.10 and 500.11 of this Part, motion papers, records and appendices. (c) Method of reproduction. All papers filed may be reproduced by any method that produces a permanent, legible, black image on white paper. Reproduction on both sides of the paper is encouraged. (d) Designation