§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of County of Monroe, Appellant,v.Nirav R. Shah,, et al., Respondents.

Brief

16 Cited authorities

  1. Society of Plastics v. Suffolk

    77 N.Y.2d 761 (N.Y. 1991)   Cited 958 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Society of Plastics Indus. v. County of Suffolk, 77 N.Y.2d 761, 570 N.Y.S.2d 778, 573 N.E.2d 1034 (1991), this Court examined the law of standing, and set forth a framework for deciding whether parties have standing to challenge governmental action in land use matters generally, and under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (ECL art. 8 [SEQRA]), specifically.

  2. Nurse Anesthetists v. Novello

    2 N.Y.3d 207 (N.Y. 2004)   Cited 312 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that standing may not be based on "hypothesized harm," and that "[p]laintiff's speculation about the future course the Guidelines might take [i.e., the future injury their application might cause to plaintiff] cannot supply the missing ingredient of in-fact injury."

  3. Association of Counties v. Axelrod

    78 N.Y.2d 158 (N.Y. 1991)   Cited 195 times

    Argued April 30, 1991 Decided June 27, 1991 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, Paul Cheeseman, J. Peter G. Bergmann, Kathy Hirata Chin and William J. Natbony for appellant. Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Clifford A. Royael, O. Peter Sherwood and Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents. Cornelius D. Murray and David M. Cherubin for New York State Health Facilities Association, Inc., amicus curiae. Susan C. Waltman for the Greater New York

  4. City of New York v. State

    86 N.Y.2d 286 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 112 times
    Observing "extreme reluctance of courts to intrude in the political relationships between the Legislature, the State and its governmental subdivisions"

  5. Matter of Hodes v. Axelrod

    70 N.Y.2d 364 (N.Y. 1987)   Cited 124 times
    Holding that the application of an amended statute permitting the revocation of a nursing home operating certificate based on an operator's industry-related felony convictions does not impair the operator's vested rights, even though the operator had successfully litigated the automatic revocation under the preexisting law

  6. Alliance of American Insurers v. Chu

    77 N.Y.2d 573 (N.Y. 1991)   Cited 57 times
    Holding that insurance companies had a due process interest in the statutorily created Property and Liability Insurance Security Fund, funded through insurer contributions and used to satisfy claims in the event of an insurer's insolvency

  7. Cnty. of Chautauqua v. Shah

    126 A.D.3d 1317 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)   Cited 19 times   1 Legal Analyses

    2015-03-20 In the Matter of COUNTY OF CHAUTAUQUA, Petitioner–Plaintiff–Respondent–Appellant, v. Nirav R. SHAH, M.D., M.P.H., as Commissioner of New York State Department of Health and New York State Department of Health, Respondents–Defendants–Appellants–Respondents. (Appeal No. 1.). Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Victor Paladino of Counsel), for Respondents–Defendants–Appellants–Respondents. Whiteman, Osterman & Hanna LLP, Albany (Christopher E. Buckey of Counsel), and Nancy Rose

  8. Cnty. of St. Lawrence v. Shah

    124 A.D.3d 88 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)   Cited 10 times

    518063 11-26-2014 In the Matter of COUNTY OF ST. LAWRENCE, Respondent, v. Nirav R. SHAH, as Commissioner of Health, et al., Appellants. (And Two Other Related Proceedings.). Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Victor Paladino of counsel), for appellants. Whiteman Osterman & Hanna, LLP, Albany (Christopher E. Buckey of counsel), for respondent. McCARTHY, J. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Victor Paladino of counsel), for appellants. Whiteman Osterman & Hanna, LLP, Albany

  9. Jeter v. Ellenville Central

    41 N.Y.2d 283 (N.Y. 1977)   Cited 59 times
    Holding that local board of education and department of social services lacked “substantive right” to challenge constitutionality of provision of New York Education Law allocating the cost of educating pupils placed in family homes to the district in which the pupil originally resided

  10. World Trade Ctr. Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litig. Angel Avila v. Professionals

    66 F. Supp. 3d 466 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)   Cited 6 times
    Describing revival statutes as applicable "only in limited circumstances," where "serious injustice" might otherwise result

  11. Section 4410 - Special education services and programs for preschool children with disabilities

    N.Y. Educ. Law § 4410   Cited 32 times
    Noting that the recommendation committee shall be composed of at least the parents and several other individuals