11 Cited authorities

  1. Strickland v. Washington

    466 U.S. 668 (1984)   Cited 158,509 times   176 Legal Analyses
    Holding an "error by counsel" doesn't "warrant setting aside the judgment of a criminal proceeding" where in the context of the whole proceeding the identified error "had no effect on the judgment"
  2. Hill v. Lockhart

    474 U.S. 52 (1985)   Cited 19,974 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a Strickland claim can be brought to challenge a guilty plea, but rejecting the claim at issue
  3. McMann v. Richardson

    397 U.S. 759 (1970)   Cited 7,400 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that even a possible misjudgment about admissibility of evidence is not ineffective assistance.
  4. Mallett v. U.S.

    334 F.3d 491 (6th Cir. 2003)   Cited 1,294 times
    Holding that a controlled-substance offense under the Sentencing Guidelines "must be determined as of the date that [the defendant's] guilt . . . was established"
  5. Watson v. U.S.

    165 F.3d 486 (6th Cir. 1999)   Cited 1,068 times
    Holding "that a defendant's informed and voluntarily waiver of the right to collaterally attack a sentence in a plea agreement bars such relief."
  6. Smith v. U.S.

    348 F.3d 545 (6th Cir. 2003)   Cited 683 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a defendant has the right to have his counsel "explain the sentencing exposure the defendant will face"
  7. U.S. v. Fleming

    239 F.3d 761 (6th Cir. 2001)   Cited 284 times
    Holding that district court's pronouncement that defendant has right to appeal does not void waiver of right to appeal contained in plea agreement which was knowingly and voluntarily made
  8. United States v. Ashe

    47 F.3d 770 (6th Cir. 1995)   Cited 123 times
    Holding that "invasion of an identifiable customer's account is not a necessary element of proof"
  9. U.S. v. Lanier

    201 F.3d 842 (6th Cir. 2000)   Cited 31 times
    Finding that the "district court correctly concluded that the dismissal with prejudice of these claims [by the Sixth Circuit] pursuant to the fugitive disentitlement doctrine precludes their consideration" in post-conviction motions
  10. Section 2255 - Federal custody; remedies on motion attacking sentence

    28 U.S.C. § 2255   Cited 129,029 times   129 Legal Analyses
    Adopting one-year limitations period for §2255 motions
  11. Section 3582 - Imposition of a sentence of imprisonment

    18 U.S.C. § 3582   Cited 54,100 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Granting district court discretion to modify sentence when Sentencing Guideline upon which sentence was based is subsequently amended