41 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 260,930 times   281 Legal Analyses
    Holding court need not credit "mere conclusory statements" in complaint
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 274,322 times   368 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
  3. H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.

    492 U.S. 229 (1989)   Cited 3,664 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the continuity prong can be met by showing that related predicate offenses continued over a substantial period of time or posed a threat of continuing activity
  4. Snyder v. Phelps

    562 U.S. 443 (2011)   Cited 851 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that signs stating "God Hates the USA/Thank God for 9/11" and "God Hates Fags" highlighted "matters of public import"
  5. Carpenters v. Scott

    463 U.S. 825 (1983)   Cited 2,078 times
    Holding that animus against a class based upon its economic views, status, or activities is beyond the reach of the deprivation clause, and reserving the question whether it reaches animus against any class other than "Negroes and those who championed their cause"
  6. Weiner v. Klais and Co., Inc.

    108 F.3d 86 (6th Cir. 1997)   Cited 1,689 times
    Holding that a document incorporated by reference in a complaint can be introduced by a defendant if it is not attached by plaintiff
  7. Bartnicki v. Vopper

    532 U.S. 514 (2001)   Cited 289 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding unconstitutional the prohibition on disclosure of illegally intercepted conversation even though the initial step in the disclosure process, the interception, was illegal and harmful to those whose privacy was invaded
  8. Moon v. Harrison Piping Supply

    465 F.3d 719 (6th Cir. 2006)   Cited 725 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that district court should have declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over IIED claim because " claim implicate[d] complex aspects of Michigan law"
  9. Bass v. Robinson

    167 F.3d 1041 (6th Cir. 1999)   Cited 922 times
    Holding that an equal protection claim must show discrimination because of the plaintiff's “membership in a particular class, not merely that he was treated unfairly as an individual”
  10. Greenberg v. Life Ins. Co. of Virginia

    177 F.3d 507 (6th Cir. 1999)   Cited 742 times
    Holding that “a document not formally incorporated by reference or attached to a complaint may still be considered part of the pleadings” if the document “is referred to in the complaint and is central to the plaintiff's claim”
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 355,101 times   943 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 160,697 times   196 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."
  13. Rule 11 - Signing Pleadings, Motions, and Other Papers; Representations to the Court; Sanctions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 11   Cited 36,716 times   146 Legal Analyses
    Holding an "unrepresented party" to the same standard as an attorney
  14. Section 1985 - Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights

    42 U.S.C. § 1985   Cited 20,195 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Concerning conspiracies to obstruct justice or intimidate a party, witness, or juror
  15. Section 1962 - Prohibited activities

    18 U.S.C. § 1962   Cited 16,119 times   60 Legal Analyses
    Specifying prohibited activities
  16. Section 1961 - Definitions

    18 U.S.C. § 1961   Cited 15,106 times   72 Legal Analyses
    Defining what the terms “person” and “enterprise” include
  17. Section 2511 - Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibited

    18 U.S.C. § 2511   Cited 2,822 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Imposing a penalty on persons who “intentionally intercept ... any wire, oral, or electronic communication”
  18. Section 750.505 - Punishment for indictable common law offenses

    Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.505   Cited 184 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Defining common law crimes
  19. Section 750.539 - Divulging contents of messages

    Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.539   Cited 30 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Divulging contents of messages-Any person connected with a telegraph, telephone or messenger company, incorporated or unincorporated, operating a line of telegraph or telephone, or engaged in the business of receiving and delivering messages in this state, in any capacity, who wilfully divulges the contents or the nature of the contents of a communication entrusted to him for transmission or delivery, or who wilfully refuses or neglects to transmit or deliver the same, or who wilfully delays the