§Why CasetextPricing

Consumerinfo.com Inc v. Jesse Willms et al

REPLY In Support MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendants' Counterclaim and Affirmative Defenses 87

10 Cited authorities

  1. Semegen v. Weidner

    780 F.2d 727 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 999 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations must be "specific enough to give defendants notice of the particular misconduct which is alleged to constitute the fraud charged so that they can defend against the charge and not just deny that they have done anything wrong"

  2. Perfumebay.com Inc. v. Ebay Inc.

    506 F.3d 1165 (9th Cir. 2007)   Cited 75 times
    Holding that the record must "affirmatively demonstrate" consumer deception

  3. Levi Strauss Company v. Shilon

    121 F.3d 1309 (9th Cir. 1997)   Cited 69 times
    Finding Lanham Act liability for a defendant who “admitted to offering to sell counterfeit Levi's jeans and components”

  4. Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana Bank

    500 F. Supp. 2d 1228 (C.D. Cal. 2007)   Cited 16 times

    No. CV 07-1534 SVW JWJX. August 1, 2007. Howard N. Wisnia; D. James Pak, Baker McKenzie, LLP, San Diego, for the Plaintiffs (Hana Financial Inc). Carlo van de Bosch, Michelle LaVoie, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter Hampton, Costa Mesa, for the Defendant (Hana Bank). ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT HANA BANK'S COUNTERCLAIM WITHOUT PREJUDICE [11] WILSON, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This case involves a trademark dispute between two financial services companies that compete for

  5. King-Size, Inc. v. Frank's King Size Clothes, Inc.

    547 F. Supp. 1138 (S.D. Tex. 1982)   Cited 31 times
    Finding that claims for trademark infringement and common law unfair competition require the same elements

  6. Emco Inc. v. Obst

    Case No. CV 03-6432-R (RZx) (C.D. Cal. May. 7, 2004)   Cited 6 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding unclean hands as a matter of law because although the defendant allegedly "has misled its customers as to the geographic origin of its ... goods," the defendant "has shown that [the plaintiff] has misled its [own] customers as to geographic origin" which is "directly related to the subject matter of [the plaintiff's] claims"

  7. Lowery v. Blue

    261 F. App'x 17 (9th Cir. 2007)

    Nos. 06-55294, 06-55330. Submitted December 4, 2007. The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2). Filed December 20, 2007. Robert A. Olson, Esq., Don A. Hernandez, Esq., The Hernandez Law Group, Pasadena, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Kenneth P. White, Esq., Brown White, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Dale S. Fischer, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-02-00003-DSF

  8. Weitzman v. Stein

    436 F. Supp. 895 (S.D.N.Y. 1977)   Cited 15 times
    Unwitting implication in fraudulent scheme

  9. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 328,019 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit

  10. Rule 9 - Pleading Special Matters

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 9   Cited 38,822 times   316 Legal Analyses
    Permitting "[m]alice, intent, knowledge, and other conditions of a person's mind [to] be alleged generally"