10 Cited authorities

Plyler v. Doe
457 U.S. 202 (1982) Cited 3,007 times 15 Legal Analyses
Holding that States cannot deny to illegal aliens the free public education they provide to citizens and legally documented aliens
Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.
415 U.S. 36 (1974) Cited 2,845 times 18 Legal Analyses
Holding that workers may bring Title VII discrimination claims in federal court notwithstanding an arbitration provision in a CBA
Phillips v. General Motors Corp.
307 F.3d 1206 (9th Cir. 2002) Cited 2,224 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the party or intervenor “seeking protection bears the burden of showing specific prejudice or harm will result if no protective order is granted”
Hoffman Plastic Compounds v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
535 U.S. 137 (2002) Cited 317 times 38 Legal Analyses
Holding that backpay awards to undocumented workers terminated in violation of the National Labor Relations Act ran counter to federal immigration law
Rivera v. Nibco, Inc.
364 F.3d 1057 (9th Cir. 2004) Cited 385 times 2 Legal Analyses
Finding magistrate judge's entry of protective order precluding defendant employer from using discovery process to support after-acquired evidence defense proper, noting that "the McKennon Court did not hold that depositions could be conducted for the purpose of uncovering illegal actions."
Krocka v. City of Chicago
203 F.3d 507 (7th Cir. 2000) Cited 375 times
Holding "where inquiries into the psychiatric health of an employee are job related and reflect a concern with the safety of employee, the employer may. . . require that the employee undergo a physical examination designed to determine his ability to work."
Papa v. United States
281 F.3d 1004 (9th Cir. 2002) Cited 200 times
Holding that immigrant could bring Bivens action for alleged due process violations during immigration detention
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. First Wireless Group, Inc.
225 F.R.D. 404 (E.D.N.Y. 2004) Cited 50 times
Holding that good cause shown for protective order where disclosure of immigration status would cause embarrassment, potential criminal charges, or deportation if status was discovered to be illegal
Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 Cited 94,469 times 650 Legal Analyses
Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37
Rule 37 - Failure to Make Disclosures or to Cooperate in Discovery; Sanctions
Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 Cited 45,699 times 317 Legal Analyses
Holding that a party may be barred from using a witness if it fails to disclose the witness

Committee for Immigrant Rights of Sonoma County et al v. County of Sonoma et al

10 Cited authorities

Holding that States cannot deny to illegal aliens the free public education they provide to citizens and legally documented aliens

Holding that workers may bring Title VII discrimination claims in federal court notwithstanding an arbitration provision in a CBA

Holding that the party or intervenor “seeking protection bears the burden of showing specific prejudice or harm will result if no protective order is granted”

Holding that backpay awards to undocumented workers terminated in violation of the National Labor Relations Act ran counter to federal immigration law

Finding magistrate judge's entry of protective order precluding defendant employer from using discovery process to support after-acquired evidence defense proper, noting that "the McKennon Court did not hold that depositions could be conducted for the purpose of uncovering illegal actions."

Holding "where inquiries into the psychiatric health of an employee are job related and reflect a concern with the safety of employee, the employer may. . . require that the employee undergo a physical examination designed to determine his ability to work."

Holding that immigrant could bring Bivens action for alleged due process violations during immigration detention

Holding that good cause shown for protective order where disclosure of immigration status would cause embarrassment, potential criminal charges, or deportation if status was discovered to be illegal

Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37

Holding that a party may be barred from using a witness if it fails to disclose the witness