§Why CasetextPricing

Clemans, et al v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., et al.

MOTION

13 Cited authorities

  1. In re Ikon Office Solutions, Inc., Securities Litigation

    194 F.R.D. 166 (E.D. Pa. 2000)   Cited 182 times
    Finding that $100 million is the informal marker constituting a "very large" settlement

  2. CSC Holdings, Inc. v. Redisi

    309 F.3d 988 (7th Cir. 2002)   Cited 160 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that each unlawful act during the limitations period was actionable, but it was a fact question whether the plaintiff could have discovered defendants' unlawful acts prior to the limitations period

  3. Salter v. Upjohn Co.

    593 F.2d 649 (5th Cir. 1979)   Cited 278 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that absent " peculiar circumstances" managing agent deposition should occur at defendant corporation's principal place of business

  4. Hemphill v. San Diego Association of Realtors, Inc.

    225 F.R.D. 616 (S.D. Cal. 2005)   Cited 37 times
    Denying discovery of class counsel's retainer agreements as not relevant to the ultimate determination of whether settlement terms are fair, reasonable, and adequate to the class

  5. Westinghouse Elec. v. Burlington, Vermont

    351 F.2d 762 (D.C. Cir. 1965)   Cited 113 times
    Holding that "[t]he Roviaro balance should be struck in each case, civil and criminal, in deciding whether disclosure is essential to a fair determination of a cause."

  6. Fresenius Medical Care Holding v. Baxter Inter

    224 F.R.D. 644 (N.D. Cal. 2004)   Cited 28 times
    Finding party may not "condition its compliance with its discovery obligations on receiving discovery from its opponent."

  7. Thayer v. Chiczewski

    257 F.R.D. 466 (N.D. Ill. 2009)   Cited 11 times
    Rejecting a claim of "work product," in absence of a burden for producing documentary evidence that effectively resulted in a "backdoor attempt to impose a privilege"

  8. HINA v. ANCHOR GLASS CONTAINER CORPORATION

    Civil Action 2:05-CV-008 (S.D. Ohio May. 22, 2008)   Cited 2 times
    Dismissing "conclusory argument" that "the discovery sought may be obtained from other sources"

  9. Bueker v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Ry. Co.

    175 F.R.D. 291 (N.D. Ill. 1997)   Cited 10 times

    Person injured in motor vehicle accident sued limousine service and railroad to recover damages. Injured person's treating physician agreed to be deposed by defendants but withdrew his consent after deposition began, and defendants moved for order compelling physician to appear for continuation of deposition. The District Court, Lefkow, United States Magistrate Judge, held that since no subpoena had been issued to physician, his appearance could not be compelled. Motion denied. Thomas M. Flaskamp

  10. WILFONG v. HORD

    Case No. C2-05-746 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 4, 2007)   Cited 1 times
    Permitting plaintiff to take deposition of affiant because prohibiting the deposition "would only present one version of the facts at issue in this case. Plaintiff is entitled to test the credibility and context of the statements made by Defendant Hord in his affidavit"

  11. Rule 45 - Subpoena

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 45   Cited 17,138 times   112 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a subpoena may command a person to attend a trial, hearing, or deposition "within 100 miles of where the person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person"

  12. Section 1681 - Congressional findings and statement of purpose

    15 U.S.C. § 1681   Cited 6,459 times   195 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the need to protect "the consumer's right to privacy"