§Why CasetextPricing

notice to the clerk of the superior court and adverse parties of remov

undefined

13 Cited authorities

  1. Standard Fire Ins. Co. v. Knowles

    568 U.S. 588 (2013)   Cited 706 times   74 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a plaintiff may not evade CAFA jurisdiction by stipulating that the class would seek damages below CAFA's jurisdictional threshold

  2. Sanchez v. Monumental Life Ins. Co

    102 F.3d 398 (9th Cir. 1996)   Cited 1,360 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defendants bears the burden to show that removal is proper

  3. IN RE FORD MOTOR CO./CITIBANK, N.A.

    264 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 2001)   Cited 685 times
    Holding that “the amount in controversy requirement cannot be satisfied by showing that the fixed administrative costs of compliance exceed $ 75,000” because to hold otherwise would be “fundamentally violative of the principle underlying the jurisdictional amount requirement—to keep small diversity suits out of federal court”

  4. Ford Motor Co. v. McCauley

    537 U.S. 1 (2002)   Cited 11 times

    No. 01-896. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Argued October 7, 2002. Decided October 15, 2002. Certiorari dismissed. Reported below: 264 F.3d 952. Seth P. Waxman argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Walter E. Dellinger, John H. Beisner, Brian P. Brooks, Jonathan D. Hacker, Christopher R. Lipsett, and Bruce M. Berman. Steve W. Berman argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Roger W. Kirby, James G. Lewis, and Russell

  5. Section 1332 - Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs

    28 U.S.C. § 1332   Cited 113,847 times   572 Legal Analyses
    Holding district court has jurisdiction over action between diverse citizens "where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000"

  6. Section 1367 - Supplemental jurisdiction

    28 U.S.C. § 1367   Cited 63,605 times   79 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in civil actions proceeding in federal court based solely on diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, the district court "shall not have supplemental jurisdiction" over "claims by plaintiffs against persons made parties under Rule . . . 24" or "over claims by persons . . seeking to intervene as plaintiffs under Rule 24," if "exercising supplemental jurisdiction over such claims would be inconsistent with the jurisdictional requirements of section 1332"

  7. Section 1441 - Removal of civil actions

    28 U.S.C. § 1441   Cited 51,002 times   151 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “[a]ny civil action of which the district courts have original jurisdiction founded on a claim or right arising under the ... laws of the United States shall be removable without regard to the citizenship or residence of the parties.”

  8. Section 1446 - Procedure for removal of civil actions

    28 U.S.C. § 1446   Cited 22,315 times   141 Legal Analyses
    Granting a defendant 30 days to remove after receipt of the first pleading that sets forth a removable claim

  9. Section 17200 - Unfair competition defined

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200   Cited 18,153 times   315 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting unlawful business practices

  10. Section 17500 - Untrue or misleading advertising

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17500   Cited 2,714 times   65 Legal Analyses
    Requiring action that originated in California to effect consumers in another state

  11. Section 1453 - Removal of class actions

    28 U.S.C. § 1453   Cited 1,374 times   109 Legal Analyses
    Providing discretion to hear an appeal from a remand order

  12. Section 532 - Unlawful defrauding of person of money, labor, or property

    Cal. Pen. Code § 532   Cited 255 times
    Obtaining property by false pretenses

  13. Rule 3.724 - Duty to meet and confer

    Cal. R. 3.724   Cited 5 times

    Unless the court orders another time period, no later than 30 calendar days before the date set for the case management conference, the parties must meet and confer, in person or by telephone, to consider each of the issues identified in rule 3.727 and, in addition, to consider the following: (1) Resolving any discovery disputes and setting a discovery schedule; (2) Identifying and, if possible, informally resolving any anticipated motions; (3) Identifying the facts and issues in the case that are