§Why CasetextPricing

Career Network, Inc. et al v. WOT Services, Ltd. et al

MOTION to substitute party defendants AND to file Amended Complaint

4 Cited authorities

  1. Hensgens v. Deere Co.

    833 F.2d 1179 (5th Cir. 1987)   Cited 909 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding post-removal joinder of a non-diverse, dispensable party destroys diversity jurisdiction

  2. Wilson v. Target Corporation

    NO 10-80451-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON (S.D. Fla. Sep. 14, 2010)   Cited 41 times
    Finding that a pre-suit demand letter and a plaintiff's "noncommittal responses" to requests for admissions sufficiently demonstrated a $75,000 amount in controversy

  3. Espat v. Espat

    56 F. Supp. 2d 1377 (M.D. Fla. 1999)   Cited 14 times
    Applying Hensgens factors to § 1447 analysis

  4. Rule 15 - Amended and Supplemental Pleadings

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 15   Cited 90,230 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding that, per N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 1024, New York law provides a more forgiving principle for relation back in the context of naming John Doe defendants described with particularity in the complaint