2012-12-27 In the Matter of Pablo COSTELLO, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF PAROLE, et al., Respondents. Alfred O'Connor, New York State Defenders Association, Albany, for petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Frank K. Walsh of counsel), for respondents. LAHTINEN Alfred O'Connor, New York State Defenders Association, Albany, for petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Frank K. Walsh of counsel), for respondents. Mayer Brown, LLP, New York City (Scott
June 10, 1998 Present — Denman, P.J., Lawton, Wisner, Balio and Boehm, JJ. Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner seeks to annul the determination of respondent rescinding its prior determination that granted him a conditional parole for deportation only (CPDO) pursuant to Executive Law § 259-i Exec. (2) (d). Respondent temporarily suspended petitioner's early release date after receiving a letter from William
(a) Each inmate shall be scheduled for a parole release inter view at least one month prior to the expiration of the minimum period of imprisonment or parole eligibility date as fixed by the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, or upon such reconsideration date as previously set by the Board of Parole ("Board"). (b) The parole release interview shall be conducted by a pane l of at least two members of the Board. (c) The panel conducting the parole release interview shall discuss with
(a) Parole Board policy and intent. It is the policy of the Board of Parole that crime victims are an integral part of the criminal justice process, that they should be treated with fairness, sensitivity and dignity at all times, and that victims of the most serious crimes should be permitted an opportunity to make an oral statement to a member of the Board of Parole in a setting that permits confidentiality and a nonthreatening atmosphere. The board's intention is to create a meaningful opportunity