Argued April 30, 1991 Decided June 27, 1991 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, Paul Cheeseman, J. Peter G. Bergmann, Kathy Hirata Chin and William J. Natbony for appellant. Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Clifford A. Royael, O. Peter Sherwood and Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents. Cornelius D. Murray and David M. Cherubin for New York State Health Facilities Association, Inc., amicus curiae. Susan C. Waltman for the Greater New York
13 Argued January 14, 2003. Decided February 20, 2003. APPEAL, by permission of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, entered October 30, 2001, which affirmed an order of the Supreme Court (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered in New York County, granting a motion by defendants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Constantine P. Kokkoris, for appellant. Lawrence Heisler, for respondents. Judges Smith, Ciparick, Wesley
2013-02-6 In the Matter of NEW SURFSIDE NURSING HOME, LLC, et al., appellants, v. Richard F. DAINES, etc., et al., respondents. Hamburger, Maxson, Yaffe, Knauer & McNally, LLP, Melville, N.Y. (David N. Yaffe, Richard Hamburger, and William P. Caffrey, Jr., of counsel), for appellants. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Richard Dearing and Sudarsana Srinivasan of counsel), for respondents. THOMAS A. DICKERSON Hamburger, Maxson, Yaffe, Knauer & McNally, LLP, Melville, N.Y. (David
2010-10100 Index No. 10185/10 M157590 06-07-2013 In the Matter of New Surfside Nursing Home, LLC, et al., appellants, v. Richard F. Daines, etc., et al., respondents. THOMAS A. DICKERSON , J.P. CHERYL E. CHAMBERS LEONARD B. AUSTIN ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ. DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION Motion by the appellants for leave to reargue an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 15, 2010, which was determined by decision and order of this Court dated February 6, 2013, or, in
(a) Payments for 1986 and subsequent rate years for the direct component of the rate as defined in section 86-2.10(c) of this Subpart shall be adjusted periodically as described in this section to reflect changes in the case mix of facilities. (b) Facilities shall report to the department changes in patient case mix as follows: (1) Full reassessments. Facilities shall, on a schedule to be established by the department, assess all their patients semiannually and submit patient review instruments pursuant