§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of New York Statewide Coalition of Hispanic Chambers of Commerce, et al., Respondents,v.The New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, et al., Appellants.

Brief

12 Cited authorities

  1. Sailors v. Board of Education

    387 U.S. 105 (1967)   Cited 281 times
    Holding that "the principle of ‘one man, one vote’ has no relevancy" to appointive selection schemes

  2. New York City Bd. of Estimate v. Morris

    489 U.S. 688 (1989)   Cited 112 times
    Holding New York City borough presidents' automatic board vote unconstitutional

  3. Rodriguez v. Popular Democratic Party

    457 U.S. 1 (1982)   Cited 123 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Puerto Rico citizens have the same equal protection right to an equivalent vote as other United States citizens

  4. Boreali v. Axelrod

    71 N.Y.2d 1 (N.Y. 1987)   Cited 243 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Finding proper balance between health concerns and cost "is a uniquely legislative function"

  5. Under 21 v. City of N.Y

    65 N.Y.2d 344 (N.Y. 1985)   Cited 112 times
    Holding that New York's Equal Protection Clause “is no broader in coverage than the Federal Provision”

  6. Metzen v. U.S.

    19 F.3d 795 (2d Cir. 1994)   Cited 26 times
    Reversing as "clear error" a district court opinion confusing a low-calorie diet with a low-cholesterol diet, albeit not in the context of a social security case

  7. Grossman v. Baumgartner

    17 N.Y.2d 345 (N.Y. 1966)   Cited 64 times
    Upholding the constitutionality of New York City's ban on tattooing

  8. Matter of Green v. Safir

    174 Misc. 2d 400 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1997)   Cited 14 times

    October 14, 1997 Emery, Celli, Cuti Brinckerhoff, New York City, for petitioner. Paul A. Crotty, Corporation Counsel of New York City, respondent pro se, and Masako C. Shiono for Paul A. Crotty and another, respondents. Richard M. Weinberg, New York City, for Council of the City of New York, amicus curiae. Schulte, Roth Zabel, New York City, for City Club of New York and others, amici curiae. EDWARD H. LEHNER, J. The central issue posed herein is whether petitioner, in his capacity as Public Advocate

  9. Health Ins. Assn. v. Corcoran

    154 A.D.2d 61 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)   Cited 11 times
    Challenging determination by State Superintendent of Insurance that use of HIV test results in screening applicants for health insurance violated § 4224

  10. Vil. of Saratoga Spgs. v. Saratoga G., Etc., Co.

    191 N.Y. 123 (N.Y. 1908)   Cited 133 times
    In Village of Saratoga Springs v. Saratoga G., etc., Co., 191 N.Y. 123, 138, Cullen, Ch. J., writes: "* * * while powers inherently and exclusively legislative cannot be delegated, there is a large field in which the legislature, to quote Chief Justice Marshall's words, 'may certainly delegate to others powers which the legislature may rightfully exercise itself.'"