22 Cited authorities

Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.
531 U.S. 457 (2001) Cited 1,088 times 25 Legal Analyses
Holding that Chevron deference is due only to a " reasonable interpretation made by the administrator of an agency"
Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.
514 U.S. 211 (1995) Cited 883 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding legislated invalidation of final judgments to be categorically unconstitutional
American Textile Mfrs. Inst. v. Donovan
452 U.S. 490 (1981) Cited 312 times
Holding that OSHA is not required to conduct a cost-benefit analysis in promulgating a standard under section 6(b) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act because “Congress uses specific language when intending that an agency engage in cost-benefit analysis”
Schechter Corp. v. United States
295 U.S. 495 (1935) Cited 1,069 times 10 Legal Analyses
Holding that Congress may not regulate intrastate sales of sick chickens or the labor of employees involved in intrastate poultry sales
Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan
293 U.S. 388 (1935) Cited 868 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that there was a nondelegation violation when Congress gave the President broad authority to prohibit the transportation of oil-related products in interstate commerce, but failed to provide any policy, establish any standard, or lay down any rules to direct the President's exercise of this authority
Trustees of Columbia Univ. v. Karibian
512 U.S. 1213 (1994) Cited 126 times
No. 93-1674. June 13, 1994. ORDERS C.A. 2d Cir. Motions of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Commission on Independent Colleges and Universities, and Equal Employment Advisory Council et al. for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 14 F. 3d 773.
Boreali v. Axelrod
71 N.Y.2d 1 (N.Y. 1987) Cited 243 times 3 Legal Analyses
Finding proper balance between health concerns and cost "is a uniquely legislative function"
New York State Club Ass'n v. City of New York
69 N.Y.2d 211 (N.Y. 1987) Cited 150 times 1 Legal Analyses
Noting that a state law "permits" activity so as to bar local regulation, only when it evidences an intent to preempt varying local regulations or "when the state specifically permits the conduct" that the locality bans
Under 21 v. City of N.Y
65 N.Y.2d 344 (N.Y. 1985) Cited 112 times
Holding that New York's Equal Protection Clause “is no broader in coverage than the Federal Provision”
Rent Assn. v. Higgins
83 N.Y.2d 156 (N.Y. 1993) Cited 85 times
Finding no physical taking where "the challenged regulations may require the owner-lessor to accept a new occupant but not a new use of its rent-regulated property"

In the Matter of New York Statewide Coalition of Hispanic Chambers of Commerce, et al., Respondents,v.The New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, et al., Appellants.

22 Cited authorities

Holding that Chevron deference is due only to a " reasonable interpretation made by the administrator of an agency"

Holding legislated invalidation of final judgments to be categorically unconstitutional

Holding that OSHA is not required to conduct a cost-benefit analysis in promulgating a standard under section 6(b) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act because “Congress uses specific language when intending that an agency engage in cost-benefit analysis”

Holding that Congress may not regulate intrastate sales of sick chickens or the labor of employees involved in intrastate poultry sales

Finding proper balance between health concerns and cost "is a uniquely legislative function"

Noting that a state law "permits" activity so as to bar local regulation, only when it evidences an intent to preempt varying local regulations or "when the state specifically permits the conduct" that the locality bans

Holding that New York's Equal Protection Clause “is no broader in coverage than the Federal Provision”

Finding no physical taking where "the challenged regulations may require the owner-lessor to accept a new occupant but not a new use of its rent-regulated property"