37 Cited authorities

  1. Gregg v. Georgia

    428 U.S. 153 (1976)   Cited 5,677 times   31 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the death penalty is not per se unconstitutional
  2. Bordenkircher v. Hayes

    434 U.S. 357 (1978)   Cited 2,469 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plea bargaining does not violate the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination
  3. Oregon v. Kennedy

    456 U.S. 667 (1982)   Cited 1,598 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that to claim double jeopardy bar defendant must show "government conduct in question [was] intended to `goad' the defendant into moving for a mistrial"
  4. Weatherford v. Bursey

    429 U.S. 545 (1977)   Cited 1,893 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a defendant in a non-capital case has no right to discover lists of prospective government witnesses
  5. United States v. Goodwin

    457 U.S. 368 (1982)   Cited 1,409 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the presumption of vindictiveness did not apply when the Government brought a felony indictment after the defendant refused to plead guilty to misdemeanor charges and demanded a jury trial
  6. Arizona v. Washington

    434 U.S. 497 (1978)   Cited 1,650 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a district court is not required to make a specific finding of manifest necessity or "articulate on the record all the factors which informed the deliberate exercise of [its] discretion" as long as the record as a whole provides sufficient justification for the ruling
  7. United States v. Jorn

    400 U.S. 470 (1971)   Cited 1,608 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that it was an abuse of discretion for trial judge to declare a mistrial without considering alternatives to the mistrial
  8. Williams v. Florida

    399 U.S. 78 (1970)   Cited 1,274 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding a conviction by a six-member jury did not violate the Sixth Amendment
  9. Illinois v. Somerville

    410 U.S. 458 (1973)   Cited 1,075 times
    Holding that since "the mistrial met the `manifest necessity" requirement of our cases, . . . the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment . . . did not bar retrial under a valid indictment."
  10. Crist v. Bretz

    437 U.S. 28 (1978)   Cited 848 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Due Process Clause protects against prosecutorial abuse