Nken v. Holder
556 U.S. 418 (2009) Cited 3,274 times 7 Legal AnalysesHolding that "courts must be mindful that the Government's role as the respondent in every removal proceeding does not make the public interest in each individual one negligible"
Hilton v. Braunskill
481 U.S. 770 (1987) Cited 2,973 times 4 Legal AnalysesHolding that if the State makes a substantial case on the merits, continued custody is permissible if the second and fourth factors "militate against release"
United States v. Western Pac. R. Co.
352 U.S. 59 (1956) Cited 1,469 times 3 Legal AnalysesHolding that the Interstate Commerce Commission, not the court, should decide whether napalm gel bombs without fuses or bursters are "incendiary bombs" within the meaning of an ICC tariff
Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.
640 F.2d 109 (8th Cir. 1981) Cited 2,592 timesHolding that issuance of a preliminary injunction depends upon a "flexible" consideration of the threat of irreparable harm to the moving party; balancing this harm with any injury an injunction would inflict on other interested parties; the probability that the moving party would succeed on the merits; and the effect on the public interest
Connell Co. v. Plumbers Steamfitters
421 U.S. 616 (1975) Cited 284 times 6 Legal AnalysesHolding that an agreement between a union and a nonlabor party, which is wholly-unrelated to any collective-bargaining effort on the part of the union and which operates or threatens to operate as a restraint on trade, may be the basis for a federal antitrust suit
Burlington No. R. Co. v. Maintenance Employes
481 U.S. 429 (1987) Cited 157 timesHolding that Norris-LaGuardia prevents injunctions against union picketing of terminals through which employer's trains ran
Republic of Philippines v. Westinghouse Elec
949 F.2d 653 (3d Cir. 1991) Cited 310 timesHolding that a party that "failed to offer evidence . . . to substantiate its claim that disclosure . . . would result in any type of competitive disadvantage," did not meet the burden to seal documents
Brown v. Pro Football, Inc.
518 U.S. 231 (1996) Cited 81 times 5 Legal AnalysesHolding that, for the nonstatutory labor exemption to apply, the questioned practice must pertain to a mandatory subject of collective bargaining and been the subject of actual arm's length negotiations
Gilder v. PGA Tour, Inc.
936 F.2d 417 (9th Cir. 1991) Cited 220 timesFinding that several month delay was not unreasonable
Regents of the University of California v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.
747 F.2d 511 (9th Cir. 1984) Cited 169 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding per se treatment likely applicable where "[b]y any account, the purpose and effect of the horizontal restraints imposed . . . have little, if any, bearing on the operative rules"
Rule 62 - Stay of Proceedings to Enforce a Judgment
Fed. R. Civ. P. 62 Cited 4,109 times 14 Legal AnalysesGranting of stay is discretionary