8 Cited authorities

Jumara v. State Farm Ins. Co.
55 F.3d 873 (3d Cir. 1995) Cited 2,421 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that a plaintiff's choice of venue "should not be lightly disturbed"
Cont'l Grain Co. v. Barge FBL-585
364 U.S. 19 (1960) Cited 1,067 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that § 1404 permits transfer of in rem claims along with in personam claims to more convenient district, even though in rem claim standing alone could not have been brought in transferee district
Burstein V. Applied Extrusion Tech. Inc.
829 F. Supp. 106 (D. Del. 1992) Cited 28 times
Finding congestion "insufficient to prevent a § 1404 transfer which is otherwise mandated by the convenience of the parties and witnesses"
Cashedge, Inc. v. Yodlee, Inc.
Civil Action No. 06-170-JJF (D. Del. Jul. 19, 2006) Cited 3 times
Finding that the "practical considerations" factor was "strongly" in favor of transfer where the proposed transferee court had presided over litigation regarding the same parties, related patents-in-suit and similar technologies, including engaging in a technology tutorial, arguing Markman issues in nine related patents, and commencing discovery on seemingly related products and technologies
Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 Cited 344,565 times 920 Legal Analyses
Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
Section 1404 - Change of venue
28 U.S.C. § 1404 Cited 28,286 times 183 Legal Analyses
Granting Class Plaintiffs' motion to transfer action in order to "facilitate a unified settlement approval process together with the class action cases in" In re Amex ASR
Section 1391 - Venue generally
28 U.S.C. § 1391 Cited 27,690 times 197 Legal Analyses
Finding that venue lies where a "substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim" occurred
Section 271 - Infringement of patent
35 U.S.C. § 271 Cited 6,027 times 1044 Legal Analyses
Holding that testing is a "use"

Boston Scientific Corporation et al v. Johnson and Johnson Inc. et al

8 Cited authorities

Holding that a plaintiff's choice of venue "should not be lightly disturbed"

Holding that § 1404 permits transfer of in rem claims along with in personam claims to more convenient district, even though in rem claim standing alone could not have been brought in transferee district

Finding congestion "insufficient to prevent a § 1404 transfer which is otherwise mandated by the convenience of the parties and witnesses"

Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss

Granting Class Plaintiffs' motion to transfer action in order to "facilitate a unified settlement approval process together with the class action cases in" In re Amex ASR

Finding that venue lies where a "substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim" occurred

Holding that testing is a "use"