15 Cited authorities

  1. Dura Pharmaceuticals v. Broudo

    544 U.S. 336 (2005)   Cited 3,519 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the securities statutes have a private of action “not to provide investors with broad insurance against market losses, but to protect them against those economic losses that misrepresentations actually cause”
  2. Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.

    552 U.S. 148 (2008)   Cited 1,174 times   79 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the fraud-on-the-market presumption did not apply because business partners' "deceptive acts were not communicated to the public"
  3. In re Cendant Corp. Litigation

    264 F.3d 201 (3d Cir. 2001)   Cited 709 times
    Holding that the PSLRA is clear that "the power to `select and retain' lead counsel belongs . . . to the lead plaintiff, and the court's role is confined to deciding whether to `approve' that choice" and that should the court disagree with the lead plaintiffs choice "it should clearly state why . . . and should direct the lead plaintiff to undertake an acceptable selection process"
  4. In re Cavanaugh

    306 F.3d 726 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 344 times
    Holding that that options traders can satisfy the typicality requirement and serve as a lead plaintiff
  5. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Monterosso

    756 F.3d 1326 (11th Cir. 2014)   Cited 177 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where a defendant is alleged to have made deceptive contributions to an overall fraudulent scheme, Janus and the issue of who is a “maker” has no bearing
  6. In re Network Associates, Inc., Securities Litigation

    76 F. Supp. 2d 1017 (N.D. Cal. 1999)   Cited 110 times
    Holding that "lead plaintiff owes a fiduciary duty to obtain the highest quality legal representation at the lowest price"
  7. Aronson v. McKesson HBOC, Inc.

    79 F. Supp. 2d 1146 (N.D. Cal. 1999)   Cited 73 times
    Holding that a lead plaintiff movant that did not file the complaint did not have to file a certification
  8. Eichenholtz v. Verifone Holdings, Inc.

    No. C 07-06140 MHP (N.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2008)   Cited 42 times
    Holding that losses incurred before the first fraud-correcting disclosure alleged in an action must be excluded pursuant to Dura
  9. In re Cardinal Health, Inc. Securities Litigation

    226 F.R.D. 298 (S.D. Ohio 2005)   Cited 44 times
    Finding movant subject to a unique defense because it purchased its shares after the company's public disclosures of investigations by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York into the company's accounting methods
  10. Perlmutter v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

    Case No.: 10-CV-03451-LHK (N.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2011)   Cited 29 times
    Explaining different methods used to calculate financial interest
  11. Section 78u-4 - Private securities litigation

    15 U.S.C. § 78u-4   Cited 7,394 times   48 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts authority to permit discovery if necessary "to preserve evidence or to prevent undue prejudice to" a party