16 Cited authorities

  1. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Tel. Service Co.

    499 U.S. 340 (1991)   Cited 3,581 times   45 Legal Analyses
    Holding "it is beyond dispute that compilations of facts are within the subject matter of copyright" even though "copyright protects only the author's original contributions—not the facts or information conveyed"
  2. Island Software Computer v. Microsoft

    413 F.3d 257 (2d Cir. 2005)   Cited 335 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a district court is “entitled to take judicial notice of . . . federal copyright registrations, as published in the Copyright Office's registry”
  3. In re Aimster Copyright Litigation

    334 F.3d 643 (7th Cir. 2003)   Cited 211 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a defendant who "disabled itself from doing anything to prevent infringement" did not reasonably implement a repeat infringer policy
  4. Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. Akanoc Solutions

    658 F.3d 936 (9th Cir. 2011)   Cited 156 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding the district court did not err "by narrowing the instruction on material contribution to the only genuine question as to that element"
  5. Autoskill v. National Educ. Support Systems

    994 F.2d 1476 (10th Cir. 1993)   Cited 236 times
    Holding that items which necessarily follow from a given theme or setting must be filtered from the court's infringement analysis
  6. Chi-Boy Music v. Charlie Club, Inc.

    930 F.2d 1224 (7th Cir. 1991)   Cited 158 times
    Holding that the district court calculation of statutory damages could consider "efficacy of the damages as a deterrent to future copyright infringement," and where infringement is willful, "the statutory damages award may be designed to penalize the infringer and to deter future violations"
  7. Country Kids 'N City Slicks, Inc. v. Sheen

    77 F.3d 1280 (10th Cir. 1996)   Cited 80 times
    Holding that "wooden form of the traditional paper doll" is idea not expression
  8. Gordon v. Nextel Comm. and Mullen Advert

    345 F.3d 922 (6th Cir. 2003)   Cited 49 times
    Concluding that summary judgment for DMCA § 1202 claims would be "inappropriate" when defendants "may be vicariously liable"
  9. BC Technical, Inc. v. Ensil International Corp.

    464 F. App'x 689 (10th Cir. 2012)   Cited 29 times

    No. 09-4011 & 09-4019 02-07-2012 BC TECHNICAL, INC., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. ENSIL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a New York corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. Terrence L. O'Brien (D. Utah) (D.C. No. 2:02-CV-700-TS-SA) ORDER AND JUDGMENT This order and judgment is an unpublished decision, not binding precedent. 10th Cir. R. 32.1(A). Citation to unpublished decisions is not prohibited. Fed. R. App. 32.1. It is appropriate as it relates to

  10. Casella v. Morris

    820 F.2d 362 (11th Cir. 1987)   Cited 46 times
    Affirming the defendant's liability for contributory infringement where he was on notice of the termination of his licensing rights but "did nothing to stop the transfer of [copyrighted content], limit its effect, inform [] other parties of the recission, or communicate in any way the termination of the [licensing] rights"
  11. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 338,098 times   161 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  12. Section 410 - Registration of claim and issuance of certificate

    17 U.S.C. § 410   Cited 1,550 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Finding that production of a certificate of copyright registration gave rise to a rebuttable presumption that copyright was valid
  13. Section 1202 - Integrity of copyright management information

    17 U.S.C. § 1202   Cited 603 times   30 Legal Analyses
    Providing that "[n]o person shall knowingly and with the intent to induce, enable, facilitate, or conceal infringement . . ."
  14. Section 104 - Subject matter of copyright: National origin

    17 U.S.C. § 104   Cited 89 times
    Providing certain works, “while unpublished, are subject to protection under this title without regard to the nationality or domicile of the author”