37 Cited authorities

  1. Eisen v. Carlisle Jacquelin

    417 U.S. 156 (1974)   Cited 3,748 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding that individual notice to class members identifiable through reasonable efforts is mandatory in (b) actions
  2. Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.

    513 U.S. 561 (1995)   Cited 995 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 12 does not apply to secondary market transactions as the statute's inclusion of the term “prospectus” evinces an intent to limit the Sections's scope solely to the initial public offering
  3. Pinter v. Dahl

    486 U.S. 622 (1988)   Cited 853 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that only a statutory "seller" may be liable under § 12 of Securities Act
  4. Virgin Atlantic Airways v. Nat. Mediation Bd.

    956 F.2d 1245 (2d Cir. 1992)   Cited 2,050 times
    Holding that "[e]ven if Rule 54(b) allows parties to request district courts to revisit earlier rulings, the moving party must do so within the strictures of the law of the case doctrine"
  5. Ganino v. Citizens Utilities Co.

    228 F.3d 154 (2d Cir. 2000)   Cited 955 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding on the basis of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 99 that "numerical benchmark" are informative but not the "exclusive" test
  6. Baffa v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette Secs. Corp.

    222 F.3d 52 (2d Cir. 2000)   Cited 678 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "class certification is inappropriate where a putative class representative is subject to unique defenses which threaten to become the focus of the litigation"
  7. In re Apple Computer Securities Litigation

    886 F.2d 1109 (9th Cir. 1989)   Cited 411 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he market could not have been made more aware" of the investment risk because the risk was thoroughly reported by the press
  8. Maywalt v. Parker Parsley Petroleum Co.

    67 F.3d 1072 (2d Cir. 1995)   Cited 239 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in rejecting objector's "mere proffer of the prospect of a claim" that the lead plaintiffs had not raised
  9. Joseph v. Wiles

    223 F.3d 1155 (10th Cir. 2000)   Cited 179 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a court must " analyze the complaint to determine whether the offenses it alleges can be characterized primarily as omissions or misrepresentations in order to determine whether the Affiliated Ute presumption should apply"
  10. Sirota v. Solitron Devices, Inc.

    673 F.2d 566 (2d Cir. 1982)   Cited 292 times
    Holding defendants liable for securities fraud because they reported consignment transactions as sales
  11. Rule 23 - Class Actions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 23   Cited 34,561 times   1230 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, to certify a class, the court must find that "questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members"
  12. Section 77k - Civil liabilities on account of false registration statement

    15 U.S.C. § 77k   Cited 2,104 times   77 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable for a false registration statement "every person who was a director of . . . or partner in the issuer" at time of filing
  13. Section 77l - Civil liabilities arising in connection with prospectuses and communications

    15 U.S.C. § 77l   Cited 815 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing relief if the offering documents contain just one untrue statement of material fact