8 Cited authorities

  1. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.

    24 Cal.4th 317 (Cal. 2000)   Cited 3,265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an implied covenant "cannot be endowed with an existence independent of its contractual underpinnings. It cannot impose substantive duties or limits on the contracting parties beyond those incorporated in the specific terms of their agreement."
  2. Yanowitz v. L'Oreal USA Inc.

    36 Cal.4th 1028 (Cal. 2005)   Cited 1,544 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that to establish a "protected activity," an "employee's communications to the employer [must] sufficiently convey the employee's reasonable concerns that the employer has acted or is acting in an unlawful discriminatory manner."
  3. Romano v. Rockwell Internat., Inc.

    14 Cal.4th 479 (Cal. 1996)   Cited 580 times
    Holding that a FEHA action for discriminatory discharge does not commence until the actual discharge
  4. Janken v. GM Hughes Electronics

    46 Cal.App.4th 55 (Cal. Ct. App. 1996)   Cited 540 times
    Holding that "[t]he intentional infliction of emotional distress claim fails" where "[t]he factual allegations . . . plead claims of discrimination" but not more
  5. McRae v. Dept. of Correc

    142 Cal.App.4th 377 (Cal. Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 264 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that filed letters, a memorandum of instruction, and an investigation were not adverse employment actions because they did not materially affect the terms, conditions, or privileges of employment
  6. State Dept. of Health Services v. Superior Court

    31 Cal.4th 1026 (Cal. 2003)   Cited 230 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that the defense of mitigation of damages applies to "many different sorts of legal claims" including statutory sexual harassment claims
  7. Malais v. Los Angeles City Fire Dept.

    150 Cal.App.4th 350 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 44 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding no adverse employment action "in transfers that involved working in assignments the employee preferred less than other assignments but with equal pay, benefits, promotional opportunities"
  8. Trovato v. Beckman Coulter, Inc.

    192 Cal.App.4th 319 (Cal. Ct. App. 2011)   Cited 37 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming summary judgment when Plaintiff filed a DFEH complaint more than a year after the last alleged violation of FEHA