§Why CasetextPricing

Memorandum_plaintiffs_memorandum_in_support_of_opposition_to_motion_to_tax_costs

Motion

11 Cited authorities

  1. Zamora v. Clayborn Contracting

    28 Cal.4th 249 (Cal. 2002)   Cited 406 times
    Concluding that the "discretionary relief provision of section 473 only permits relief from attorney error 'fairly imputable to the client, i.e., mistakes anyone could have made' "; and that " '[c]onduct falling below the professional standard of care, such as failure to timely object or to properly advance an argument, is not therefore excusable' "

  2. Gorman v. Tassajara Development Corp.

    178 Cal.App.4th 44 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 324 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that meals are not recoverable under Cal. Civ. P.Code § 1033.5.

  3. Nelson v. Anderson

    72 Cal.App.4th 111 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999)   Cited 283 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Finding that obligations violated by limiting plaintiff's role were owed to the corporation because the decisions "amount[ed] to alleged misfeasance or negligence in managing the corporation's business, causing the business to be a total failure"

  4. Cardinal Health 301, Inc. v. Tyco Electronics Corp.

    169 Cal.App.4th 116 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 145 times
    Holding that express warranty which lacked duration defined in units of time did not fall under § 2725 exception

  5. Thatcher v. Lucky Stores

    79 Cal.App.4th 1081 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000)   Cited 59 times
    In Thatcher, the trial court granted summary judgment solely on the basis that no opposition was filed, consistent with a local rule providing that failure to file opposition to a motion could be deemed an admission that the motion was meritorious.

  6. Sanford v. Rasnick

    246 Cal.App.4th 1121 (Cal. Ct. App. 2016)   Cited 30 times
    In Sanford v. Rasnick (2016) 246 Cal.App.4th 1121 (Sanford), the defendants served a section 998 offer on the plaintiff conditioned on "[t]he notarized execution and transmittal of a written settlement agreement and general release."

  7. Ripley v. Pappadopoulos

    23 Cal.App.4th 1616 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994)   Cited 63 times
    Holding that Federal Express charges are expressly disallowed—presumably because they constitute "postage"

  8. Foothill-De Anza Community College Dist. v. Emerich

    158 Cal.App.4th 11 (Cal. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 36 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Restricting the vote on a community college bond measure to residents had a rational basis; there was a probability that "local residents had a greater knowledge and interest in local affairs, while nonresident property owners would mainly be interested in lower taxes"

  9. Thon v. Thompson

    29 Cal.App.4th 1546 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994)   Cited 35 times
    Disagreeing court erred by, inter alia, "awarding costs absent sufficient detail of the expenditures"; defendant supplied itemized costs and attorney declaration asserting necessity, and "absent an explicit statement by the trial court to the contrary, it is presumed the court properly exercised its legal duty"

  10. Landwatch San Luis Obispo Cnty. v. Cambria Cmty. Servs. Dist.

    25 Cal.App.5th 638 (Cal. Ct. App. 2018)   Cited 7 times   2 Legal Analyses

    2d Civil No. B281823 06-28-2018 LANDWATCH SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CAMBRIA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, Defendant and Respondent. Environmental Law Clinic, Mills Legal Clinic at Stanford Law School, Deborah A. Sivas ; Cynthia Hawley, Cambria, for Plaintiff and Appellant. Rutan & Tucker, LLP, Robert S. Bower, John A. Ramirez, Peter J. Howell, Costa Mesa; Carmel & Naccasha, LLP, Timothy J. Carmel, San Luis Obispo, Michael M. McMahon for Defendant and Respondent. GILBERT,

  11. Rule 3.1700 - Prejudgment costs

    Cal. R. 3.1700   Cited 276 times

    (a) Claiming costs (1)Trial costs A prevailing party who claims costs must serve and file a memorandum of costs within 15 days after the date of service of the notice of entry of judgment or dismissal by the clerk under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.5 or the date of service of written notice of entry of judgment or dismissal, or within 180 days after entry of judgment, whichever is first. The memorandum of costs must be verified by a statement of the party, attorney, or agent that to the best