14 Cited authorities

  1. Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael

    526 U.S. 137 (1999)   Cited 12,999 times   31 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Daubert gatekeeping standard applies not only to "scientific testimony" but also to "all expert testimony"
  2. General Electric Co. v. Joiner

    522 U.S. 136 (1997)   Cited 4,999 times   43 Legal Analyses
    Holding that under the abuse of discretion standard the appellate court will not reverse unless the ruling is manifestly erroneous
  3. Sargon Enterprises, Inc. v. University of Southern California

    55 Cal.4th 747 (Cal. 2012)   Cited 762 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Finding trial court properly excluded expert testimony
  4. Engalla v. Permanente Med. Grp., Inc.

    15 Cal.4th 951 (Cal. 1997)   Cited 1,217 times
    Holding that a party's "course of delay" in performing the terms of the contract, when "unreasonable or undertaken in bad faith, may provide sufficient grounds" for a finding of waiver
  5. Kids' Universe v. In2Labs

    95 Cal.App.4th 870 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002)   Cited 348 times
    Finding expert testimony insufficient to demonstrate lost profits where a small toy store claimed that flood damage to the store caused by defendant led to $50 million in lost profits because Plaintiff's new website would have allowed it to compete in the Internet toy marketing business
  6. Jennings v. Palomar Pomerado Health Systems, Inc.

    114 Cal.App.4th 1108 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003)   Cited 264 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Striking expert opinion and noting that "plaintiff must offer an expert opinion that contains a reasoned explanation illuminating why the facts have convinced the expert, and therefore should convince the jury, that it is more probable than not the negligent act was a cause-in-fact of the plaintiff's injury"
  7. Roy Allan Slurry Seal, Inc. v. Am. Asphalt S., Inc.

    2 Cal.5th 505 (Cal. 2017)   Cited 112 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Noting that a tortious interference claim "protects the expectation that the relationship eventually will yield the desired benefit, not necessarily the more speculative expectation that a potentially beneficial relationship will eventually arise."
  8. Nasrawi v. Buck Consultants LLC

    231 Cal.App.4th 328 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014)   Cited 68 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that to aid and abet a breach of fiduciary duty, the plaintiff must plead that the defendant had actual knowledge of the breach and provided substantial assistance or encouragement in it
  9. Peralta v. Vons Cos.

    24 Cal.App.5th 1030 (Cal. Ct. App. 2018)   Cited 27 times

    B282130 05-30-2018 Rose PERALTA et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. The VONS COMPANIES, INC., Defendant and Respondent. Carpenter, Zuckerman & Rowley, Beverly Hills, Stephen K. McElroy and Josh M. Dowell, for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Pauline White, for Defendant and Respondent. JOHNSON, J. Carpenter, Zuckerman & Rowley, Beverly Hills, Stephen K. McElroy and Josh M. Dowell, for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Pauline White, for Defendant and Respondent. JOHNSON, J. This appeal arises from a slip and

  10. Taylor v. Trimble

    13 Cal.App.5th 934 (Cal. Ct. App. 2017)   Cited 26 times

    B276723 07-27-2017 Jerry TAYLOR, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Alton TRIMBLE et al. Defendants and Respondents. Sharifi Firm and Scott Michael Good for Plaintiff and Appellant. Mark R. Weinder & Associates and Kathryn Albarian, Glendale, for Defendants and Respondents. MANELLA, J. Sharifi Firm and Scott Michael Good for Plaintiff and Appellant. Mark R. Weinder & Associates and Kathryn Albarian, Glendale, for Defendants and Respondents. MANELLA, J.Following the drowning death of his five-year old son

  11. Section 17200 - Unfair competition defined

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200   Cited 18,362 times   316 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting unlawful business practices