29 Cited authorities

  1. Ashcroft v. Iqbal

    556 U.S. 662 (2009)   Cited 249,650 times   279 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim is plausible where a plaintiff's allegations enable the court to draw a "reasonable inference" the defendant is liable
  2. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 263,703 times   364 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a complaint's allegations should "contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to 'state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face' "
  3. Cruz v. Beto

    405 U.S. 319 (1972)   Cited 5,411 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a Buddhist prisoner stated a claim under the First and Fourteenth Amendments when he alleged that he was placed in solitary confinement for proselytizing, while inmates of other religions were encouraged to participate in religious programs
  4. Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.

    567 F.3d 1120 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 2,237 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that circumstances constituting fraud must be stated with particularity
  5. Cook, Perkiss Liehe v. N.C. Collection Serv

    911 F.2d 242 (9th Cir. 1990)   Cited 2,199 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an advertisement that "impl[ies] lower rates and better services than those of a competitor . . . constitutes puffery and is not actionable as false advertising"
  6. Clegg v. Cult Awareness Network

    18 F.3d 752 (9th Cir. 1994)   Cited 1,842 times
    Holding that a national organization was not sufficiently connected to a "place" open to the public
  7. Williams v. Gerber Products

    552 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2008)   Cited 903 times   35 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "reasonable consumers expect that the ingredient list ... confirms other representations on the packaging"
  8. Al-Kidd v. Ashcroft

    580 F.3d 949 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 781 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Iqbal does not impose a probability requirement
  9. Robertson v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.

    749 F.2d 530 (9th Cir. 1984)   Cited 1,545 times
    Holding that voluntary dismissal of causes of action not covered by summary judgment order creates an appealable final order
  10. Gilligan v. Jamco Development Corp.

    108 F.3d 246 (9th Cir. 1997)   Cited 956 times
    Setting forth elements of a FHA claim
  11. Section 1750 - Title of act

    Cal. Civ. Code § 1750   Cited 2,642 times   67 Legal Analyses

    This title may be cited as the Consumers Legal Remedies Act. Ca. Civ. Code § 1750 Added by Stats. 1970, Ch. 1550.

  12. Section 1790 - Title of act

    Cal. Civ. Code § 1790   Cited 682 times   6 Legal Analyses

    This chapter may be cited as the "Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act." Ca. Civ. Code § 1790 Added by Stats. 1970, Ch. 1333.

  13. Section 2313 - Express warranties by affirmation, promise, description, sample

    Cal. Com. Code § 2313   Cited 362 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that an express warranty is a "promise made by the seller to the buyer which relates to the goods"
  14. Section 1761 - Definitions

    Cal. Civ. Code § 1761   Cited 262 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Defining “consumer” under the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act as “an individual who seeks or acquires, by purchase or lease, any goods or services for personal, family, or household purposes”