§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Appellant,v.Collin F. Lloyd-Douglas, Respondent.

Brief

39 Cited authorities

  1. Miranda v. Arizona

    384 U.S. 436 (1966)   Cited 60,228 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that statements obtained by custodial interrogation of a criminal defendant without warning of constitutional rights are inadmissible under the Fifth Amendment

  2. Arizona v. Fulminante

    499 U.S. 279 (1991)   Cited 5,281 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that involuntary confessions are subject to harmless-error review

  3. Colorado v. Connelly

    479 U.S. 157 (1986)   Cited 4,815 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the government bears the burden of proving the validity of a Miranda waiver by a preponderance of the evidence

  4. Missouri v. Seibert

    542 U.S. 600 (2004)   Cited 1,989 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[s]trategists dedicated to draining the substance out of" constitutional protections cannot accomplish by planning around these protections because it "effectively threatens to thwart [their] purpose"

  5. Moran v. Burbine

    475 U.S. 412 (1986)   Cited 4,084 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Sixth Amendment does not apply to statements a defendant makes to police before he is indicted

  6. McNeil v. Wisconsin

    501 U.S. 171 (1991)   Cited 1,800 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Sixth Amendment's right to counsel is "offense specific," and once invoked, does not automatically apply to all future charges.

  7. Maryland v. Shatzer

    559 U.S. 98 (2010)   Cited 768 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an individual can be subject to interrogation after invoking the right to counsel if there is a break in custody of fourteen days or longer

  8. Fare v. Michael C.

    442 U.S. 707 (1979)   Cited 1,661 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that officers' remarks to a sixteen-year-old juvenile that a cooperative attitude would be to his benefit were far from threatening or coercive where he was thoroughly informed of his Miranda rights and the officers' questioning was "restrained and free from the abuses that so concerned the Court in Miranda"

  9. Colorado v. Spring

    479 U.S. 564 (1987)   Cited 1,214 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that suspect need not "know and understand every possible consequence of a waiver"

  10. Florida v. Powell

    559 U.S. 50 (2010)   Cited 389 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that warnings need only reasonably convey to a suspect his Miranda rights