19 Cited authorities

  1. Miranda v. Arizona

    384 U.S. 436 (1966)   Cited 60,116 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that statements obtained by custodial interrogation of a criminal defendant without warning of constitutional rights are inadmissible under the Fifth Amendment
  2. Berghuis, Warden v. Thompkins

    560 U.S. 370 (2010)   Cited 2,828 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that federal courts can "deny writs of habeas corpus under § 2254 by engaging in de novo review when it is unclear whether AEDPA deference applies"
  3. Schneckloth v. Bustamonte

    412 U.S. 218 (1973)   Cited 11,934 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding the State need not prove knowing-and-deliberate consent to search
  4. Rhode Island v. Innis

    446 U.S. 291 (1980)   Cited 6,112 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a police officer's subjective intent to obtain incriminatory statements is not relevant to determining whether an interrogation has occurred
  5. Missouri v. Seibert

    542 U.S. 600 (2004)   Cited 1,982 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[s]trategists dedicated to draining the substance out of" constitutional protections cannot accomplish by planning around these protections because it "effectively threatens to thwart [their] purpose"
  6. Dickerson v. United States

    530 U.S. 428 (2000)   Cited 2,282 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “the protections announced in Miranda ” are “constitutionally required”
  7. Moran v. Burbine

    475 U.S. 412 (1986)   Cited 4,077 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Sixth Amendment does not apply to statements a defendant makes to police before he is indicted
  8. North Carolina v. Butler

    441 U.S. 369 (1979)   Cited 2,334 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding they are not
  9. Johnson v. Zerbst

    304 U.S. 458 (1938)   Cited 8,790 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a waiver of constitutional rights must be knowing and intelligent
  10. Florida v. Powell

    559 U.S. 50 (2010)   Cited 387 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that warnings need only reasonably convey to a suspect his Miranda rights