§Why CasetextPricing

The People, Appellant,v.Terrance L. Mack, Respondent.

Brief

12 Cited authorities

  1. People v. Benevento

    91 N.Y.2d 708 (N.Y. 1998)   Cited 4,212 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 713-14 (1998), the New York Court of Appeals held that "meaningful representation" included a prejudice component which focuses on the "fairness of the process as a whole rather than [any] particular impact on the outcome of the case."

  2. People v. Baldi

    54 N.Y.2d 137 (N.Y. 1981)   Cited 5,973 times   6 Legal Analyses
    In Baldi, the New York State Court of Appeals expressly applied the right to effective assistance of counsel guaranteed by the federal Constitution.

  3. People v. Satterfield

    66 N.Y.2d 796 (N.Y. 1985)   Cited 923 times
    Noting that C.P.L. 440.30 contemplates that a court will first determine whether or not a C.P.L. 440.10 motion can be decided without a hearing

  4. People v. O'Rama

    78 N.Y.2d 270 (N.Y. 1991)   Cited 568 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding the defendant was prejudiced when the court failed to read a portion of the jury note stating jury was split "6/6," told counsel the jury was experiencing "continued disagreements," and subsequently issued a supplemental instruction urging a verdict

  5. People v. Henry

    95 N.Y.2d 563 (N.Y. 2000)   Cited 410 times

    Argued November 15, 2000. Decided December 21, 2000. APPEAL, by permission of a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, from an order of that Court, entered November 29, 1999, which (1) reversed, on the law, a judgment of the Supreme Court (Seymour Katz, J.), rendered in Queens County upon a verdict convicting defendant of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree, and (2) ordered a new trial. Donna Aldea, for appellant. Todd A

  6. People v. Starling

    85 N.Y.2d 509 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 190 times
    Holding that "the statutory definition of the term [sell] conspicuously excludes any requirement that the transfer be commercial in nature or conducted for a particular type of benefit or underlying purpose"

  7. People v. Alcide

    2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 6598 (N.Y. 2013)   Cited 74 times

    2013-10-10 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James ALCIDE, Appellant. Lynn W.L. Fahey, Appellate Advocates, New York City (Melissa S. Horlick of counsel), for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn (Leonard Job-love and Keith Dolan of counsel), for respondent. READ Lynn W.L. Fahey, Appellate Advocates, New York City (Melissa S. Horlick of counsel), for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn (Leonard Job-love and Keith Dolan of counsel), for respondent

  8. People v. Caserta

    19 N.Y.2d 18 (N.Y. 1966)   Cited 178 times
    In Caserta, the New York Court of Appeals reversed a conviction solely because a witness was permitted to testify about his out-of-court identification and another witness was permitted to corroborate this testimony.

  9. People v. Williams

    2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 3866 (N.Y. 2013)   Cited 43 times

    2013-05-30 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Timothy WILLIAMS, Appellant. Steven Banks, Legal Aid Society, New York City (Laura Lieberman Cohen of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York City (Daniel R. Alonso and Hilary Hassler of counsel), for respondent. Steven Banks, Legal Aid Society, New York City (Laura Lieberman Cohen of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York City (Daniel R. Alonso and Hilary Hassler of

  10. People v. James Kadarko

    2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 2834 (N.Y. 2010)   Cited 45 times
    Finding no error where counsel was affirmatively informed of, but did not object to, formalistic violation of O'Rama