38 Cited authorities

Arizona v. Fulminante
499 U.S. 279 (1991) Cited 5,281 times 20 Legal Analyses
Holding that involuntary confessions are subject to harmless-error review
United States v. Nixon
418 U.S. 683 (1974) Cited 4,074 times 15 Legal Analyses
Holding appeal of District Court's denial of motion to quash subpoena duces tecum was in the Court of Appeals for purposes of § 1254
Branzburg v. Hayes
408 U.S. 665 (1972) Cited 1,806 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that government need not “demonstrate some ‘compelling need’ for a newsman's testimony”
Kapon v. Koch
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 2327 (N.Y. 2014) Cited 494 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that a state statute requiring notice in tort and negligence actions did not apply to federal civil rights claims
Smith v. Daily Mail Publishing Co.
443 U.S. 97 (1979) Cited 308 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding newspapers had First Amendment right to publish names of juvenile offenders
People v. Huntley
15 N.Y.2d 72 (N.Y. 1965) Cited 1,460 times 2 Legal Analyses
Adopting a procedure for providing a separate hearing about the voluntariness of a confession to be offered in evidence against a defendant at his or her trial
United States v. Cuthbertson
630 F.2d 139 (3d Cir. 1980) Cited 228 times
Holding that the privilege extends to unpublished materials that a reporter holds back
U.S. v. Treacy
639 F.3d 32 (2d Cir. 2011) Cited 95 times
Holding erroneous admission of false exculpatory statement harmless where “other evidence in the prosecution's case was vastly more significant to demonstrating [defendant's] actual actions”
United States v. Burke
700 F.2d 70 (2d Cir. 1983) Cited 198 times
Concluding that there is "no legally-principled reason for drawing a distinction between civil and criminal cases when considering whether the reporter's interest in confidentiality should yield to the moving party's need for probative evidence."
O'Neill v. Oakgrove Constr
71 N.Y.2d 521 (N.Y. 1988) Cited 165 times 1 Legal Analyses
Recognizing a qualified privilege arising under the federal and the state constitutions for non-confidential materials
Rule 501 - Privilege in General
Fed. R. Evid. 501 Cited 4,123 times 21 Legal Analyses
Recognizing that "in a civil case, state law governs privilege regarding a claim or defense for which state law supplies the rule of decision"
Section 79-H - Special provisions relating to persons employed by, or connected with, news media
N.Y. Civ. Rights Law § 79-H Cited 184 times 5 Legal Analyses
Applying New York's Shield Law only to "professional journalists and newscasters"

In the Matter of the People, Appellant,v.Conrado Juarez, Defendant. Frances Robles, Nonparty Respondent.

38 Cited authorities

Holding that involuntary confessions are subject to harmless-error review

Holding appeal of District Court's denial of motion to quash subpoena duces tecum was in the Court of Appeals for purposes of § 1254

Holding that government need not “demonstrate some ‘compelling need’ for a newsman's testimony”

Holding that a state statute requiring notice in tort and negligence actions did not apply to federal civil rights claims

Holding newspapers had First Amendment right to publish names of juvenile offenders

Adopting a procedure for providing a separate hearing about the voluntariness of a confession to be offered in evidence against a defendant at his or her trial

Holding that the privilege extends to unpublished materials that a reporter holds back

Holding erroneous admission of false exculpatory statement harmless where “other evidence in the prosecution's case was vastly more significant to demonstrating [defendant's] actual actions”

Concluding that there is "no legally-principled reason for drawing a distinction between civil and criminal cases when considering whether the reporter's interest in confidentiality should yield to the moving party's need for probative evidence."

Recognizing a qualified privilege arising under the federal and the state constitutions for non-confidential materials

Recognizing that "in a civil case, state law governs privilege regarding a claim or defense for which state law supplies the rule of decision"

Applying New York's Shield Law only to "professional journalists and newscasters"