39 Cited authorities

  1. Jackson v. Denno

    378 U.S. 368 (1964)   Cited 5,135 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that trial judge must determine, at a separate hearing, that a confession is voluntary before it may be heard by a jury
  2. Giles v. California

    554 U.S. 353 (2008)   Cited 813 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that exception applies "only when the defendant engaged in conduct designed to prevent the witness from testifying"
  3. People v. Huntley

    15 N.Y.2d 72 (N.Y. 1965)   Cited 1,461 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Adopting a procedure for providing a separate hearing about the voluntariness of a confession to be offered in evidence against a defendant at his or her trial
  4. United States v. Burke

    700 F.2d 70 (2d Cir. 1983)   Cited 198 times
    Concluding that there is "no legally-principled reason for drawing a distinction between civil and criminal cases when considering whether the reporter's interest in confidentiality should yield to the moving party's need for probative evidence."
  5. O'Neill v. Oakgrove Constr

    71 N.Y.2d 521 (N.Y. 1988)   Cited 165 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing a qualified privilege arising under the federal and the state constitutions for non-confidential materials
  6. People v. Moses

    63 N.Y.2d 299 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 142 times
    Explaining that "a false alibi may be due not to consciousness of guilt of the crime charged but to consciousness of some incriminating evidence and the justifiable desire to remain free"
  7. Holmes v. Winter

    2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 8194 (N.Y. 2013)   Cited 37 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding out-of-State balancing test to provide insufficient protection
  8. Matter of Beach v. Shanley

    62 N.Y.2d 241 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 91 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Beach we held that a Grand Jury subpoena should have been quashed where the only testimony sought was the identity of a broadcast reporter's confidential source.
  9. Knight-Ridder v. Greenberg

    70 N.Y.2d 151 (N.Y. 1987)   Cited 81 times
    In Green (27 Cal 3d at 59-62, 609 P2d at 504-506), the Supreme Court of California addressed a question similar to the one before us. Green is pertinent because the California capital punishment statute does not require that the murder be "in furtherance of" the felony.
  10. Brady v. Ottaway Newspapers

    63 N.Y.2d 1031 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 85 times

    Argued October 17, 1984 Decided November 20, 1984 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Abraham Isseks, J. Joseph Sluzar for defendants-appellants. Peter E. Bloom for plaintiffs-appellants. Robert Abrams, Attorney-General ( Jeffrey I. Slonim, Peter H. Schiff and Howard L. Zwickel of counsel), for respondent. MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. In this action for damages for libel, plaintiffs and defendants

  11. Section 710.30 - Motion to suppress evidence; notice to defendant of intention to offer evidence

    N.Y. Crim. Proc. Law § 710.30   Cited 2,404 times
    Requiring notice to be given when the State intends to offer testimony at trial regarding the observation of a defendant at the crime scene by a witness who has identified him before trial
  12. Section 240.20 - [Repealed] Discovery; upon demand of defendant

    N.Y. Crim. Proc. Law § 240.20   Cited 947 times

    N.Y. Crim. Proc. Law § 240.20 Repealed by New York Laws 2019 , ch. 59, Sec. LLL-1, eff. 1/1/2020.

  13. Section 79-H - Special provisions relating to persons employed by, or connected with, news media

    N.Y. Civ. Rights Law § 79-H   Cited 184 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Applying New York's Shield Law only to "professional journalists and newscasters"