37 Cited authorities

  1. Jackson v. Denno

    378 U.S. 368 (1964)   Cited 4,889 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that trial judge must determine, at a separate hearing, that a confession is voluntary before it may be heard by a jury
  2. Giles v. California

    554 U.S. 353 (2008)   Cited 621 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that prior testimony is admissible if the witness is unavailable and the defense had an opportunity to cross-examine the witness on this prior testimony
  3. People v. Huntley

    15 N.Y.2d 72 (N.Y. 1965)   Cited 1,338 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Adopting a procedure for providing a separate hearing about the voluntariness of a confession to be offered in evidence against a defendant at his or her trial
  4. United States v. Burke

    700 F.2d 70 (2d Cir. 1983)   Cited 181 times
    Concluding that there is "no legally-principled reason for drawing a distinction between civil and criminal cases when considering whether the reporter's interest in confidentiality should yield to the moving party's need for probative evidence."
  5. O'Neill v. Oakgrove Constr

    71 N.Y.2d 521 (N.Y. 1988)   Cited 154 times
    Recognizing a qualified privilege arising under the federal and the state constitutions for non-confidential materials
  6. People v. Moses

    472 N.E.2d 4 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 140 times
    Explaining that "a false alibi may be due not to consciousness of guilt of the crime charged but to consciousness of some incriminating evidence and the justifiable desire to remain free"
  7. Matter of Beach v. Shanley

    62 N.Y.2d 241 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 86 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Beach we held that a Grand Jury subpoena should have been quashed where the only testimony sought was the identity of a broadcast reporter's confidential source.
  8. Brady v. Ottaway Newspapers

    63 N.Y.2d 1031 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 75 times

    Argued October 17, 1984 Decided November 20, 1984 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Abraham Isseks, J. Joseph Sluzar for defendants-appellants. Peter E. Bloom for plaintiffs-appellants. Robert Abrams, Attorney-General ( Jeffrey I. Slonim, Peter H. Schiff and Howard L. Zwickel of counsel), for respondent. MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. In this action for damages for libel, plaintiffs and defendants

  9. Knight-Ridder v. Greenberg

    70 N.Y.2d 151 (N.Y. 1987)   Cited 68 times
    In Green (27 Cal 3d at 59-62, 609 P2d at 504-506), the Supreme Court of California addressed a question similar to the one before us. Green is pertinent because the California capital punishment statute does not require that the murder be "in furtherance of" the felony.
  10. People v. Leonti

    18 N.Y.2d 384 (N.Y. 1966)   Cited 119 times
    Holding that, despite limits on its review of pure questions of fact, seeN.Y. Const. art. 6, § 3, when presented with mixed question of law and fact, Court of Appeals could decide “whether the evidence adduced meets the [legal] standard required”
  11. Section 79-H - Special provisions relating to persons employed by, or connected with, news media

    N.Y. Civ. Rights Law § 79-H   Cited 160 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Applying New York's Shield Law only to "professional journalists and newscasters"