25 Cited authorities

  1. Winegrad v. N.Y. Univ. Medical Center

    64 N.Y.2d 851 (N.Y. 1985)   Cited 13,025 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Reversing the motion court's order granting the defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment where they failed to demonstrate, with admissible proof, that the claims against them should be dismissed
  2. Blake v. Neighborhood Hous. Serv. of N.Y.C.

    1 N.Y.3d 280 (N.Y. 2003)   Cited 1,401 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an accident alone does not establish a Labor Law § 240 violation"
  3. Cahill v. Triborough

    4 N.Y.3d 35 (N.Y. 2004)   Cited 503 times
    Finding that the worker's actions constituted negligence and a jury could have found his negligence to be the sole cause of his injuries
  4. Madeline D'Anthony Enters., Inc. v. Sokolowsky

    101 A.D.3d 606 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)   Cited 377 times

    2012-12-27 MADELINE D'ANTHONY ENTERPRISES, INC., Plaintiff, ZCAM LLC, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Robert (Robbie) SOKOLOWSKY, et al., Defendants–Respondents. Kossoff & Unger, New York (Joseph Goldsmith of counsel), for appellant. Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel PC, New York (Paul N. Gruber of counsel), for respondents. ANDRIAS Kossoff & Unger, New York (Joseph Goldsmith of counsel), for appellant. Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel PC, New York (Paul N. Gruber of counsel), for respondents

  5. Kershaw v. Hosp. for Special Surgery

    114 A.D.3d 75 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 164 times

    2013-12-24 Bruce KERSHAW, Plaintiff–Respondent–Appellant, v. HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY, et al., Defendants–Appellants–Respondents, New York University Medical Center Hospital for Joint Diseases, Defendant–Respondent, Joshua Steinvurzel, Defendant. Peltz & Walker, New York (Bhalinder L. Rikhye of counsel), for appellants-respondents. Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, New York (Brian J. Isaac of counsel), and Shoshana T. Bookson, New York, for respondent-appellant. PETER TOM Peltz & Walker, New

  6. Perez v. Folio House, Inc.

    123 A.D.3d 519 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)   Cited 69 times

    2014-12-11 Jamie PEREZ, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. FOLIO HOUSE, INC., et al., Defendants–Appellants. Folio House, Inc., et al., Third–Party Plaintiffs, v. West New York Restoration of CT., Inc., Third–Party Defendant. Carol R. Finocchio, New York, for appellants. William Schwitzer & Associates LLC, New York (Jeffrey B. Bromfeld of counsel), for respondent. SWEENY Carol R. Finocchio, New York, for appellants. William Schwitzer & Associates LLC, New York (Jeffrey B. Bromfeld of counsel), for respondent

  7. Rodriguez v. Dormitory Auth. of N.Y.

    104 A.D.3d 529 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 61 times   1 Legal Analyses

    2013-03-19 Jose RODRIGUEZ, et al., Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. DORMITORY AUTHORITY OF the STATE of New York, et al., Defendants–Appellants, Enclos Corp., Defendant–Respondent–Appellant. Enclos Corp., Third–Party Plaintiff–Respondent–Appellant, v. Atlantic Heydt Corp., Third–Party Defendant–Respondent. [And A Second Third–Party Action]. Newman Myers Kreines Gross Harris P.C., New York (Adrienne Yaron of counsel), for appellants. Law Offices of James J. Toomey, New York (Eric P. Tosca of counsel), for

  8. Gary v. Flair Beverage Corp.

    60 A.D.3d 413 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)   Cited 58 times
    Holding that the indemnified party "is also entitled to . . . costs pursuant to the broad language of the indemnification clause" which did not explicitly mention costs
  9. Calcano v. Rodriguez

    91 A.D.3d 468 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)   Cited 48 times
    In Calcano v Rodriguez (91 AD3d 468, 468 [1st Dept 2012]), this Court held, "The plaintiff in a negligence action cannot obtain summary judgment as to liability if triable issues remain as to the plaintiff's own negligence and share of culpability for the accident" (citing Thoma, 82 NY2d at 737).
  10. Paz v. City of New York

    85 A.D.3d 519 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)   Cited 38 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that giving general instructions on what needs to be completed, monitoring and oversight of timing and quality of the work, and having general duty to ensure compliance with safety regulations and authority to stop work for safety reasons is insufficient to impose liability under Labor Law Section 200