14 Cited authorities

  1. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly

    550 U.S. 544 (2007)   Cited 278,987 times   369 Legal Analyses
    Holding that allegations of conduct that are merely consistent with wrongdoing do not state a claim unless "placed in a context that raises a suggestion of" such wrongdoing
  2. Continental Co. v. Union Carbide

    370 U.S. 690 (1962)   Cited 814 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Court of Appeals erred by addressing plaintiff's allegations as separate claims, because in an antitrust case "plaintiffs should be given the full benefit of their proof without tightly compartmentalizing the various factual components and wiping the slate clean after scrutiny of each."
  3. In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs

    123 F.3d 599 (7th Cir. 1997)   Cited 339 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that in injunction case, the defendant's cost of compliance with the injunction can be added to meet the minimum amount in controversy
  4. In re Pressure Sensitive Labelstock Antitrust Litigation

    566 F. Supp. 2d 363 (M.D. Pa. 2008)   Cited 49 times
    Finding insufficient allegations that parent participated in antitrust conspiracy on its own, even though court already found sufficient allegations that subsidiary did participate
  5. In re Urethane Antitrust Litigation

    663 F. Supp. 2d 1067 (D. Kan. 2009)   Cited 32 times
    Declining to apply American Pipe tolling when sitting in diversity because of the established principle that "state law alone must govern the application of a tolling principle to a state's statute of limitations"
  6. Standard Iron Works v. Arcelormittal

    639 F. Supp. 2d 877 (N.D. Ill. 2009)   Cited 26 times
    Finding plausibility despite lack of direct evidence of collective action by looking at a series of industry meetings attended by steel executives that were followed by industry-wide production cuts
  7. United States v. Hayter Oil Co. of Greeneville

    51 F.3d 1265 (6th Cir. 1995)   Cited 44 times
    Holding that withdrawal from a conspiracy constitutes "an affirmative defense which must be proven by the defendant"
  8. In re Lithium Ion Batteries Antitrust Litigation

    Case No.: 13-MD-2420 YGR (N.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2014)   Cited 15 times
    Finding affirmative act where the defendant made public, false statements affirming their compliance with applicable antitrust laws, and took affirmative steps to destroy evidence of secret meetings
  9. In re Urethane Antitrust Litigation

    683 F. Supp. 2d 1214 (D. Kan. 2010)   Cited 10 times
    Declining supplemental jurisdiction over EU antitrust claim and reporting the parties were "unable to identify any reported case in which a court in the United States exercised jurisdiction over antitrust claims asserted under European law"
  10. Precision Assocs., Inc. v. Panalpina World Transp. (Holding) Ltd.

    08-CV-00042 (JG)(VVP) (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 19, 2015)   Cited 5 times

    08-CV-00042 (JG)(VVP) 08-19-2015 PRECISION ASSOCIATES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. PANALPINA WORLD TRANSPORT (HOLDING) LTD., et al., Defendants. APPEARANCES: LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN P.L.L.P. 100 Washington Avenue South, Suite 2200 Minneapolis, MN 55401 By: W. Joseph Brockner Heidi M. Silton Anna M. Horning Nygren Craig S. Davis Kristen G. Marttila Attorneys for Plaintiffs LOVELL STEWART HALEBIAN JACOBSON LLP 61 Broadway, Suite 501 New York, NY 10006 By: Christopher Lowell Gary S. Jacobson Ian T

  11. Rule 8 - General Rules of Pleading

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8   Cited 163,402 times   197 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[e]very defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading. . . ."