Argue v. Triton Digital, Inc. et alMOTION for Summary JudgmentW.D. Pa.March 27, 2017IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JEREMY ARGUE, Plaintiff, v. TRITON DIGITAL, INC., ANDO MEDIA, LLC, and VECTOR TRITON (LUX) 1, S.À R.L., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:16-cv-00133 DEFENDANT VECTOR TRITON (LUX) 1, S.À. R.L.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 and for the reasons more fully set forth in the accompanying memorandum in support, Defendant Vector Triton (Lux) 1, S.a. r.l. (“Vector”), moves this Court for an Order confirming its dismissal, with prejudice, from all claims asserted in the Amended Complaint (Doc. 32). The Amended Complaint set forth three counts. Two of those counts – conversion and declaration of ownership – were dismissed by the Court pursuant to its December 22, 2016 Order. Doc. 42. The single remaining claim in the Amended Complaint is for unjust enrichment. Plaintiff pursued that claim against only defendants Triton Digital, Inc. and Ando Media, LLC. Accordingly, because Plaintiff does not claim that Vector was unjustly enriched, and because Vector is not a defendant for the sole remaining claim, Vector is entitled to, and now requests, an award of summary judgment in its favor. A proposed Order is attached hereto. Case 2:16-cv-00133-MAK Document 73 Filed 03/27/17 Page 1 of 2 Respectfully submitted, OGLETREE DEAKINS /s/James F. Glunt James F. Glunt, Esq. PA ID No. 85555 jay.glunt@ogletreedeakins.com Jennifer G. Betts, Esq. jenn.betts@ogletreedeakins.com PA ID No. 209699 One PPG Place Suite 1900 Pittsburgh, PA 15222 Telephone: (412) 394-3339 CONLEY ROSE, P.C. Darlene Ghavimi, Esq. TX Bar No. 24072114 PA Bar No. 207540 dghavimi@conleyrose.com Stewart N. Mesher TX Bar. No. 24032378 smesher@conleyrose.com 13413 Galleria Circle, Suite 100 Austin, TX 78738 (512) 610-3425 Attorneys for Defendant Vector Triton (Lux) 1. S.à r.l. 29217267.2 Case 2:16-cv-00133-MAK Document 73 Filed 03/27/17 Page 2 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JEREMY ARGUE, Plaintiff, v. TRITON DIGITAL, INC., ANDO MEDIA, LLC, and VECTOR TRITON (LUX) 1, S.À R.L., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:16-cv-00133 ORDER AND NOW, this _____ day of __________________, 2017, upon consideration of the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant Vector Triton (Lux) S.À R.L., and Plaintiff’s response thereto, if any, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to Defendant Vector Triton (Lux) S.À R.L. The Clerk of Courts is hereby directed to enter JUDGMENT in favor of Vector Triton (Lux) 1, S.à. r.l., and against Plaintiff. BY THE COURT: ________________________________ Hon. Mark A. Kearney Case 2:16-cv-00133-MAK Document 73-1 Filed 03/27/17 Page 1 of 1